From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thor Thayer To: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:57:40 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] dt-bindings: mfd: Add Altera Arria10 System Resource Chip bindings In-Reply-To: <1459278791-3646-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> Message-ID: <57111E8B.1040503@opensource.altera.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: Hi Lee On 03/30/2016 06:35 AM, Lee Jones wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, ttha...@opensource.altera.com wrote: From: Thor Thayer To: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org The Altera Arria10 Devkit System Resource chip is a Multi-Function Device, it has two subdevices: - GPIO - HWMON This patch adds documentation for the Altera A10-SR DT bindings. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer --- .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/altera-a10sr.txt | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/altera-a10sr.txt diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/altera-a10sr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/altera-a10sr.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..564c761 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/altera-a10sr.txt @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +* Altera Arria10 Development Kit System Resource Chip + +Required parent device properties: +- compatible : "altr,altr_a10sr" +- spi-max-frequency : Maximum SPI frequency. +- reg : the SPI Chip Select address for the Arria10 System Resource chip DT bindings are much easier to read in the following format: - compatible : "altr,altr_a10sr" - spi-max-frequency : Maximum SPI frequency. - reg : the SPI Chip Select address for the Arria10 System Resource chip ... also, sentences start with an uppercase char. +The A10SR consists of this varied group of sub-devices: + +Device Description +------ ---------- +altr_a10sr_gpio GPIO Controller +altr_a10sr_hwmon Hardware Monitor + +The LEDs are implemented entirely in the device tree using +the gpio-led framework. This is a Linuxisum and should not live in DT bindings. +Example: + + a10-sr: a10-sr@0 { Nodes should be named after their device 'type'. Does this device really start a address 0? I see in the documentation on device trees there are a number of categories I can use. GPIO is easy because it is one of the categories but I'm not sure about the new device I'm adding since the a10sr is a new device. I believe I should only call out the name and address on the SPI bus like: a10sr@0 { + compatible = "altr,altr-a10sr"; + reg = <0>; + spi-max-frequency = <100000>; + + a10sr_gpio: a10sr_gpio { Device type only please. and this would be a10sr_gpio: gpio-controller { Does that seem correct? + compatible = "altr,a10sr-gpio"; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + ngpios = <16>; + }; + + a10sr_hwmon: a10sr_hwmon { Device type only please. I need to revisit where this will live (hwmon does not seem to be the correct place) so it will change but I can follow the format above if it is correct. Thanks for reviewing. + compatible = "altr,a10sr-hwmon"; + }; + }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html