Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/amd_nb: add support for newer PCI topologies

Borislav Petkov
2018-11-08T02:48:47Z

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:10:44AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> No, the idea was more that that temp monitoring, e.g., k10temp, could
> be independent of amd_nb.
>
> But I can tell this idea isn't going anywhere, so let's just forget
> that I stuck my neck out and let it die on the vine :)

No no, your idea makes sense. I see the advantage of not having to do
enablement so that old k10temp can load on new machines. Sure.

We just need to find out about the PNP ID...

:-)

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.