From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Birk Skyum <birk.skyum@pm.me>
Cc: Anvesh Jain P <anvesh.p@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org>,
Maya Matuszczyk <maccraft123mc@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: test sensor and variant handling
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:59:50 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77c05024-1742-7106-eb83-a4776f76d397@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908135801.81436-3-birk.skyum@pm.me>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2026, Birk Skyum wrote:
> Exercise the sensor callbacks against a simulated I2C adapter. Check
> little-endian RPM decoding, short transfers, malformed byte counts,
> the unavailable-temperature sentinel and propagation of bus errors.
>
> Check that the Lenovo compatible takes precedence over its reference-
> board fallback, that its sensor attributes are read-only, and that its
> probe and PM/remove callbacks do not issue control writes. Keep coverage
> of the strict reference-board capability-response validation.
>
> The tests use KUnit and never access a physical EC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Birk Skyum <birk.skyum@pm.me>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c | 294 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec.c | 4 +
> 4 files changed, 311 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index c3c208602..53ad3ca48 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -22442,6 +22442,7 @@ L: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/qcom-ec.rst
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/embedded-controller/qcom,hamoa-crd-ec.yaml
> +F: drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c
> F: drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec.c
>
> QUALCOMM HEXAGON ARCHITECTURE
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig
> index 4f338c715..d940973be 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -105,4 +105,16 @@ config EC_QCOM_HAMOA
> This driver supports Hamoa/Purwa/Glymur reference devices and read-only
> fan speed and temperature monitoring on the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x.
>
> +config EC_QCOM_HAMOA_KUNIT_TEST
> + bool "Tests for the Qualcomm EC driver" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on EC_QCOM_HAMOA && KUNIT && OF
> + depends on EC_QCOM_HAMOA=m || KUNIT=y
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + help
> + Test the Qualcomm EC driver's sensor transactions and read-only
> + callbacks using a simulated I2C adapter. No physical EC is accessed.
> + Run these tests in a disposable test kernel, for example under QEMU.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> endif # ARM64_PLATFORM_DEVICES
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c b/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..68868ef76
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Included by qcom-hamoa-ec.c to test its private transport and callbacks. */
> +
> +#include <kunit/resource.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +
> +struct qcom_ec_test_context {
> + struct i2c_adapter adapter;
> + struct qcom_ec ec;
> + u32 functionality;
> + int transfer_result;
> + int byte_result;
> + u8 reply[4];
> + u8 block_length;
> + unsigned int transactions;
> + unsigned int writes;
> +};
> +
> +static int qcom_ec_test_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> + struct i2c_msg *messages, int count)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = i2c_get_adapdata(adapter);
> +
> + ctx->transactions++;
> + /* Only the RPM query's combined write/read transaction is allowed. */
> + if (count != 2 || messages[0].addr != 0x76 || messages[1].addr != 0x76 ||
> + messages[0].flags || messages[1].flags != I2C_M_RD ||
> + messages[0].len != 2 || messages[1].len != 3 ||
> + messages[0].buf[0] != 0x22 || messages[0].buf[1] != 1) {
Why are you using literals for things that are named on the driver side
(e.g. that 0x22)?
--
i.
> + ctx->writes++;
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +
> + if (ctx->transfer_result == 2)
> + memcpy(messages[1].buf, ctx->reply, messages[1].len);
> +
> + return ctx->transfer_result;
> +}
> +
> +static s32 qcom_ec_test_smbus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 address,
> + unsigned short flags, char read_write, u8 command,
> + int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = i2c_get_adapdata(adapter);
> +
> + ctx->transactions++;
> + if (read_write != I2C_SMBUS_READ) {
> + ctx->writes++;
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> + if (address != 0x76 || flags)
> + return -EPROTO;
> +
> + if (command == 0x29 && size == I2C_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA) {
> + if (ctx->byte_result < 0)
> + return ctx->byte_result;
> + data->byte = ctx->byte_result;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if ((command == 0x0e || command == 0x42) && size == I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA) {
> + data->block[0] = ctx->block_length;
> + memcpy(&data->block[1], ctx->reply, ctx->block_length);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -EPROTO;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 qcom_ec_test_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = i2c_get_adapdata(adapter);
> +
> + return ctx->functionality;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_algorithm qcom_ec_test_algorithm = {
> + .master_xfer = qcom_ec_test_transfer,
> + .smbus_xfer = qcom_ec_test_smbus,
> + .functionality = qcom_ec_test_functionality,
> +};
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_test_delete_adapter(void *data)
> +{
> + i2c_del_adapter(data);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_test_unregister_client(void *data)
> +{
> + i2c_unregister_device(data);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_ec_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ctx);
> + test->priv = ctx;
> + ctx->functionality = I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE_DATA |
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK;
> + ctx->transfer_result = 2;
> + ctx->reply[0] = 2;
> + ctx->byte_result = 36;
> + ctx->adapter.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + ctx->adapter.algo = &qcom_ec_test_algorithm;
> + strscpy(ctx->adapter.name, "qcom-ec-kunit", sizeof(ctx->adapter.name));
> + i2c_set_adapdata(&ctx->adapter, ctx);
> + ret = i2c_add_adapter(&ctx->adapter);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, qcom_ec_test_delete_adapter, &ctx->adapter);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> + ctx->ec.client = i2c_new_dummy_device(&ctx->adapter, 0x76);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->ec.client);
> + ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, qcom_ec_test_unregister_client, ctx->ec.client);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + ctx->ec.variant = &qcom_ec_slim7x;
> + i2c_set_clientdata(ctx->ec.client, &ctx->ec);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_rpm_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + static const struct {
> + int transfer_result;
> + u8 count;
> + int error;
> + } failures[] = {
> + { 0, 2, -EIO },
> + { 1, 2, -EIO },
> + { -EREMOTEIO, 2, -EREMOTEIO },
> + { -ETIMEDOUT, 2, -ETIMEDOUT },
> + { 2, 0, -EPROTO },
> + { 2, 1, -EPROTO },
> + { 2, 3, -EPROTO },
> + { 2, 0xff, -EPROTO },
> + };
> + long value = -1;
> + int i;
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read_fan_rpm(&ctx->ec, &value), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, 0);
> + ctx->reply[1] = 0xef;
> + ctx->reply[2] = 0xbe;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read_fan_rpm(&ctx->ec, &value), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, 0xbeef);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failures); i++) {
> + value = -1;
> + ctx->transfer_result = failures[i].transfer_result;
> + ctx->reply[0] = failures[i].count;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, qcom_ec_read_fan_rpm(&ctx->ec, &value),
> + failures[i].error, "case %d", i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, -1);
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->writes, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_temperature_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + static const int temperatures[] = { 0, 36, 254, 255, -EREMOTEIO };
> + long value;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(temperatures); i++) {
> + value = -1;
> + ctx->byte_result = temperatures[i];
> + ret = qcom_ec_hwmon_read(&ctx->ec.client->dev, hwmon_temp,
> + hwmon_temp_input, 0, &value);
> + if (temperatures[i] < 0) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, temperatures[i]);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, -1);
> + } else if (temperatures[i] == 255) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -ENODATA);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, -1);
> + } else {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, temperatures[i] * 1000);
> + }
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->writes, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_read_only_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct device *dev = &ctx->ec.client->dev;
> + long value = -1;
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_is_visible(NULL, hwmon_fan, hwmon_fan_input, 0),
> + 0444);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_is_visible(NULL, hwmon_temp, hwmon_temp_input, 0),
> + 0444);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_is_visible(NULL, hwmon_fan, hwmon_fan_input, 1), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_is_visible(NULL, hwmon_pwm, hwmon_pwm_input, 0), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_read(dev, hwmon_fan, hwmon_fan_input, 1, &value),
> + -EOPNOTSUPP);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_read(dev, hwmon_pwm, hwmon_pwm_input, 0, &value),
> + -EOPNOTSUPP);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, value, -1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_suspend(dev), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_resume(dev), 0);
> + qcom_ec_remove(ctx->ec.client);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->transactions, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_probe_transport_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +
> + ctx->functionality = I2C_FUNC_I2C;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_probe(&ctx->ec), -EOPNOTSUPP);
> + ctx->functionality = I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE_DATA;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_probe(&ctx->ec), -EOPNOTSUPP);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->transactions, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_probe_sensor_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_probe(&ctx->ec), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->transactions, 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->writes, 0);
> + ctx->reply[0] = 0;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_hwmon_probe(&ctx->ec), -EPROTO);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->writes, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_reference_validation_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct qcom_ec_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + u8 response[3];
> +
> + ctx->block_length = 3;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read(&ctx->ec, EC_THERMAL_CAP_CMD, 3, response), 0);
> + ctx->block_length = 2;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read(&ctx->ec, EC_THERMAL_CAP_CMD, 3, response), -EIO);
> + ctx->block_length = 0;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read(&ctx->ec, EC_THERMAL_CAP_CMD, 3, response),
> + -EOPNOTSUPP);
> + ctx->block_length = 3;
> + ctx->reply[0] = 0;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read(&ctx->ec, EC_THERMAL_CAP_CMD, 3, response), -EINVAL);
> + ctx->reply[0] = 1;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, qcom_ec_read(&ctx->ec, EC_THERMAL_CAP_CMD, 3, response), -EINVAL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->writes, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_ec_variant_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + static const char compatible[] = "lenovo,yoga-slim7x-ec\0qcom,hamoa-crd-ec";
> + struct property property = {
> + .name = "compatible",
> + .length = sizeof(compatible),
> + .value = (void *)compatible,
> + };
> + struct device_node node = { .properties = &property };
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> +
> + match = of_match_node(qcom_ec_of_match, &node);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, match);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, match->data, &qcom_ec_slim7x);
> + property.value = "qcom,hamoa-crd-ec";
> + property.length = sizeof("qcom,hamoa-crd-ec");
> + match = of_match_node(qcom_ec_of_match, &node);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, match);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, match->data, &qcom_ec_reference);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case qcom_ec_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_rpm_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_temperature_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_read_only_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_probe_transport_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_probe_sensor_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_reference_validation_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(qcom_ec_variant_test),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite qcom_ec_test_suite = {
> + .name = "qcom-hamoa-ec",
> + .init = qcom_ec_test_init,
> + .test_cases = qcom_ec_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suite(qcom_ec_test_suite);
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec.c b/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec.c
> index 3a4ca8a0d..043f6ab7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/qcom-hamoa-ec.c
> @@ -596,3 +596,7 @@ module_i2c_driver(qcom_ec_i2c_driver);
>
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM Hamoa Embedded Controller");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EC_QCOM_HAMOA_KUNIT_TEST)
> +#include "qcom-hamoa-ec-test.c"
> +#endif
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 13:58 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Monitor Yoga Slim 7x EC sensors without taking over cooling Birk Skyum
2026-09-08 13:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: monitor Slim 7x legacy sensors Birk Skyum
2026-09-08 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 14:36 ` Birk Skyum
2026-09-09 4:58 ` Anvesh Jain P
2026-09-15 9:28 ` Anvesh Jain P
2026-10-14 8:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-09-08 13:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: test sensor and variant handling Birk Skyum
2026-09-08 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 7:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-09-15 9:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Monitor Yoga Slim 7x EC sensors without taking over cooling Anvesh Jain P
2026-09-15 14:17 ` Birk Skyum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77c05024-1742-7106-eb83-a4776f76d397@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anvesh.p@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=birk.skyum@pm.me \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@quora.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maccraft123mc@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox