From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from codeconstruct.com.au (pi.codeconstruct.com.au [203.29.241.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF70313C9DE; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.241.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730848878; cv=none; b=qG2jznM5fwxKmfQPvbMUDzcOFNx3zyd8AWGJhZ4dSJIeLLfzdNX3uoMzEvTVAU2nheO00vkny0bj3ltG2/XRbHsiIXRKXo0V8FzQAN1VPXNrl4F7TT6Jza79BJ0iHhNv6gcW7rQxmsFUEJx6YTnAfGZKH2Jy5MpgMWMihU6y7Zw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730848878; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9xVg8S5A3dEOoVAga7+s67CM1EOce2OgL3F1GFpjD6c=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=KQIumiZfyLc6GuJ9IbSMDgr9QlPvqMVMcgYZmgemD8UoOw3WrCoRxIVsUxtKJtRwpHKLofDjir7zCAyiZOquQ2tY/3+ZOgvyE2iTaMQnHjSqbru7b1qJaV46yDMI0l6MW6hvglt1tyknYhun1SidHD/eNEX8MN3oxRCD3CLEKvM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeconstruct.com.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.b=i2BNR8di; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.241.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeconstruct.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.b="i2BNR8di" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeconstruct.com.au; s=2022a; t=1730848873; bh=9xVg8S5A3dEOoVAga7+s67CM1EOce2OgL3F1GFpjD6c=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=i2BNR8diE+bStAGqu0zYAfibKHrcVQtX9N4pflhBAUSdqW9IEM2OcclPJ48QwPlVa GJPIcEHQ2ASnJHrarkOPjgskPbban8Hn+uqI1IOaTF34Pfo5YCoVfWsf+M2n/6+Yxe HUa69kNuNSNjMIUOTEmvYkCVcN5Q/9vBrNM23GmsBzlOUSO+nApi1KChXTFYz2UACw gBWe1Ztlchpgua51i8VwZSFqf0nNaVWpteN1aCTfocGyuikG5JnjYkFT1p4m0xtrkb nhmZHYnuBrC3msnJr5cCJa0Cba3PJcLzi6usLnTXHfmaZceCbF7l2wHkSgwbwqJjl1 fivt5GIneEFaA== Received: from [192.168.68.112] (ppp118-210-162-114.adl-adc-lon-bras34.tpg.internode.on.net [118.210.162.114]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52A0D6B407; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:21:11 +0800 (AWST) Message-ID: <9e9bf461b2ef8993bb46206b3cdf40806a528856.camel@codeconstruct.com.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: sbp1: IBM sbp1 BMC board From: Andrew Jeffery To: Guenter Roeck , Naresh Solanki Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, sylv@sylv.io, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Joel Stanley , Patrick Rudolph , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 09:51:10 +1030 In-Reply-To: <7d9657ff-1c4a-4167-982a-9f07e7b51f77@roeck-us.net> References: <20241104092220.2268805-1-naresh.solanki@9elements.com> <20241104092220.2268805-2-naresh.solanki@9elements.com> <7d9657ff-1c4a-4167-982a-9f07e7b51f77@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 07:47 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/4/24 20:10, Naresh Solanki wrote: > [ ... ] >=20 > > > =C2=A0From a spot check, the warnings seem legitimate. Did you send > > > the right > > > patches? > > Just checked again. They are resolved. But I guess the dtbinding > > patch > > for the above warning are merged in hwmon-next branch & not in > > dt/next > >=20 >=20 > Did I apply some patches which should have been applied elsewhere ? >=20 > If so, please let me know, and I'll drop them. No need to drop anything for now: It was just that bindings for some hwmon devices defined in hwmon-next are used in Naresh's devicetree here. Merging hwmon-next and applying his patches resolves my concerns. Unless anyone feels otherwise, I expect we can can carry on independently with the understanding it will be resolved in the same way at the next rc1 (barring any other concerns with Naresh's patches). Andrew