Re: [PATCH 0/3] driver core: generalize driver_override infrastructure

["Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>]

On Mon Mar 2, 2026 at 10:41 AM CET, Gui-Dong Han wrote:
>> Danilo Krummrich (3):
>>   driver core: generalize driver_override in struct device
>>   hwmon: axi-fan: don't use driver_override as IRQ name
>>   driver core: platform: use generic driver_override infrastructure
>
> Hi Danilo,
>
> It looks like some usages of platform_device->driver_override were
> missed. I found them here:
> - drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
> - drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c
> - drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c
> - sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c

They should all be covered by patch 3, no?

> The good news is these can be easily updated to use the new APIs. This
> is required to avoid breaking the build, since the field is removed
> from struct platform_device. The previous build likely passed because
> these weren't enabled. I will use allyesconfig for testing going
> forward.
>
> I scanned for similar cases and most fit the new APIs perfectly. One
> exception is drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c. It does
> strcmp(dev->driver_override, PCISTUB_DRIVER_NAME) instead of using
> drv->name. We might want to change device_match_driver_override() to
> take a const char * instead to handle this.

xen_pcibk_pci_driver should use the exact same define, so we can just convert
this to:

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
index e4b27aecbf0591..301207b4a30dac 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
@@ -609,9 +609,9 @@ static int pcistub_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)

 	match = pcistub_match(dev);

-	if ((dev->driver_override &&
-	     !strcmp(dev->driver_override, PCISTUB_DRIVER_NAME)) ||
-	    match) {
+	if (device_match_driver_override(&dev->dev,
+					 &xen_pcibk_pci_driver.driver) > 0 ||
+					 match) {

 		if (dev->hdr_type != PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL
 		    && dev->hdr_type != PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {

I.e. no separate API needed.

> Besides axi-fan, I didn't find any other drivers that need to read
> driver_override. This is great, as it means we hopefully won't need to
> expose a read API at all.

Great, thanks for checking.