From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304F9C433EF for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 00:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A934610E9 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 00:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241034AbhKIANg (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:13:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:42930 "EHLO mail-wr1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229618AbhKIANf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:13:35 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id c4so29881146wrd.9; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:10:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=ZVPz7RE8j2SkZNiVARcZPJsD5NeLqgS5xDhGT2VjvE8=; b=Et97hYx7KsK2cSgvcsoHqrVsGke8XEFv7c9k9xJm9thTnxtxwNekgB3u5MKaAwdwH/ HWWqoLZGCQ1Xoluo2qF6uYnFDwQKY0yzwtZtkFYfM5IXJ5I9juaQtp8detkqHNv5qcoT P8nF/dKxoCTUXWWpdzMHMA7Biiz/vkso0yDe9uMKZfXh21LEpnBnHM9Y4Z+iqtSyEQe9 j/pw1FCZcTL6/9bSdfA+iG4zY1M5v8LNtuKVFnOFO/owaapoIW6uPn3lj1i2hLjs+pDB vR8SGVwv/7uSYPHVJjXhuAUFDAxtk8hNpVUHcl+tmxw3DoMr4BeXC18srzo9XyW18Np5 T2qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fDoDeHk0SGtyF1efVjKjr5vMg9G3XFmvf/xBLDmEFnOtKyLAC 4cWmYCHyWx6Z4GiRfrlmhKk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDtVTOsf2hgIXK1UcXDkH1yPcg6ieLQb6in8srUrjNQwgbnF1zEqOZyb7+uzNv/sCyjjKqBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d07:: with SMTP id e7mr3776175wrq.311.1636416649789; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocinante ([95.155.85.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm20961016wri.41.2021.11.08.16.10.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:10:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:10:47 +0100 From: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= To: Babu Moger Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, clemens@ladisch.de, jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/amd_nb: Add AMD Family 19h Models (10h-1Fh) and (A0h-AFh) PCI IDs Message-ID: References: <163640820320.955062.9967043475152157959.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu> <163640828133.955062.18349019796157170473.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <163640828133.955062.18349019796157170473.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Hello! > Add the new PCI Device IDs to support new generation of AMD 19h family of > processors. This commit message matches the spirit of past additions very well, as per: commit b3f79ae45904 ("x86/amd_nb: Add Family 19h PCI IDs") Admittedly, it would be nice to know what platform and/or generations of AMD family of CPUs this is for. Unless this is somewhat confidential and in which case it would be fair enough. For the following PCI related changes: [...] > --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h > @@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M60H_DF_F3 0x144b > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F3 0x1443 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F3 0x1653 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M10H_DF_F3 0x14b0 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M40H_DF_F3 0x167c > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M50H_DF_F3 0x166d > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_CNB17H_F3 0x1703 Acked-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński Krzysztof