From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F239217580 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721627238; cv=none; b=MhtXpwYePQPRwZO0JsiKvKGzBhwGiD0HU6UvCNuKIvvI9RDPsAK7NBiRqeSuv9m4pCo7Ajf7bODnWLeiz/3PUDWGPTfxdXHjQDdylPFX/XvwIhqhYKLTNZmyrN3DY35ruK0ZaMn/QbyY8ZLVV5lJCg8YwW6bD/NCZQBE6gtXJcA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721627238; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D6KnXAX45OC2vIuk0F8OFqhTdvYNuNyCAKPZZ5aPzGM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LXPLIpOvhfyOuUrFGa/Rk3V7yBw7dOlqEBSG+vEThlxb0Fuys7+fWECe0nrG1dbDCWg30uv9Lx0IbE73VxopfG0KrIGtQ3eCMZjwrsL6l8mDoeMWb59sCIJD2Xh1+QEpRGY+kk8GAvgxZMnY+8gDGp0QW8wqU5MuRli6gVLAm7w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lg6CXV9t; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lg6CXV9t" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBA00C116B1; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:47:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1721627237; bh=D6KnXAX45OC2vIuk0F8OFqhTdvYNuNyCAKPZZ5aPzGM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lg6CXV9tnz3zOscMBi0sm19Vi2H6ru8ZpTsUfddY6DCltvz2RKp3BtRnoMlSDBIrv GCFbGtBryriN5zlrYUHAcqiBkhFx7djLlhay/2bvQGhptRX5i3nTO6OsFbM+LKTZF1 0KMl3SCaqVVYyYWMDf/cQoeVC6RAoAdBy/YlA1gCb5K03nsaKqbt+ocsQCvWP/05ZR eJuBou+n12KdaM0zevHMmqZ4LzMDFta49qoaaB321wdvHAVmTIEHx7nHigSZJoim+0 Lktv6kIuI7ef5iEiaOPW0WlJ7rCjSXkv3qczuTHjW9e7wcdglUbSqi45knScHCkpUU GdhsBI/joMePQ== Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:47:14 +0000 From: Tzung-Bi Shih To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Hardware Monitoring Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (max16065) Fix alarm attributes Message-ID: References: <20240721193506.2330006-1-linux@roeck-us.net> <20240721193506.2330006-2-linux@roeck-us.net> <3335085f-7ab5-436f-b358-f53a3763b63b@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3335085f-7ab5-436f-b358-f53a3763b63b@roeck-us.net> On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:48:51PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 7/21/24 20:30, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 12:35:06PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Chips reporting overcurrent alarms report it in the second alarm register. > > > > I can't understand the sentence. Not sure whether it needs to be rephrased or > > not. s/overcurrent/overvoltage/. > > > > No, it is over-current. Not all chips support current measurements. > Those who do support it also support reporting over-current alarms. > Over-current alarms are reported in the second alarm register. Table 16 in [1] and Table 11 in [2] use "overvoltage". Please ignore the comments if I'm misunderstanding. [1]: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/max16067.pdf [2]: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/max16068.pdf > Do you have a suggestion for better wording ? No, or I guess I can understand the sentence strucutre a bit now: Chips (reporting overcurrent alarms) report it in the second alarm register.