From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA30129D19; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 11:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724240355; cv=none; b=ZKH/lFqKMvHJRXUMul5ScQ0zREVMBZM0EtXFDJgjeYOE3+X5C4F7t9+9HNI6MG6sx08iFcxWZsGwOAqtko9+whzuNON+PSor8eK9cmTsd3Xgs9uwQbAVR5i0OToV7IameixoIuYR6GOoTHc+c3heurZJHrBReVDFCQMxzuRBhKE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724240355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RIiQDcEhoxlNGd/zdSvvh5yA88ICiJ5gJYczwRbow9E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Nq/6qQkOmDXm1qyAY5i50LHOtJFE8LhUz0ANK+keNY68LwueRUqcS8r5Icu9JhaFEBBUY4rsB6I4CmaWexCm5dc3M4+m6RhcxANTG5hZmEg/CQfoBx5gof1D63ka66xJT+TLCvjldruw50OCBF274ljgH7USZS/4SlKIaglqIhU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=n/8oOeE9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="n/8oOeE9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724240354; x=1755776354; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RIiQDcEhoxlNGd/zdSvvh5yA88ICiJ5gJYczwRbow9E=; b=n/8oOeE9NxbFWMr9fAFIXpJ24Wfr3MZ8+98OIO5fiLjrthBzdZ3MYZdk P9sM+moFeXHJrXFQIvg8EsEdCilTRg0uAiCSUsicn9AzBRES9yQG4Uekq nZwQ/dMY5wfJZD6tVzHipDrhWIVGmYC33x/Jr5AYU/tSB15RdzRb7hsz+ 4FoJz6Df67B/dt6DrOHErELc2gGNvaxpfyDP63N3QIciKnE/ee/3Yi98V r9SAFmFcSXWlOQEoAS94b9k9MbQYrHIhZHD0Yr+gwzPHp0HR7kKF1ioV+ hIrotyOo9dOZYwgNpypRRTXh6mCOAZWt2t7wJ7f0BW4waxOgGIAmZOrqM g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3fKhCEE6QrOXf3Aros5ouw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZYG22NP1RdamD3kCvGs+1A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11170"; a="26388901" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,164,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="26388901" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2024 04:39:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hLNacqnqSTS7jGoR+8WWNw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /fpYZqKMRs+sTNfuGqUq1w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,164,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="65271967" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2024 04:39:09 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sgjgA-0000000036K-0ABS; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:39:06 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:39:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Raag Jadav Cc: Rodrigo Vivi , Andi Shyti , jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, tursulin@ursulin.net, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, linux@roeck-us.net, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com, badal.nilawar@intel.com, riana.tauro@intel.com, ashutosh.dixit@intel.com, karthik.poosa@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915/hwmon: expose fan speed Message-ID: References: <20240809061525.1368153-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 06:52:10AM +0300, Raag Jadav wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:49:23PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:00:27PM +0300, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 12:57:54PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 02:48:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 11:45:25AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: ... > > > > > I do not understand why we pollute Git history with changelogs, but it's > > > > > probably the ugly atavism in DRM workflow. > > > > > > > > I never liked it! Besides it should even be against the > > > > submitting patches recommendation. > > > > > > > > I don't understand what interest might have someone in a couple > > > > of years, reading this commit, knowing an unintellegible list of > > > > differences between v2 and v3. > > > > > > > > I consider it a random pollution of the commit log. > > > > I agree it is ugly. But I don't agree it is just a 'random polution'. > > > > I consider a valid and very useful information of the patch history. > > Very useful for a later cross check to know what exactly version > > of that patch got merged. > > Useful for distros on backports as well. > > Isn't this why we have 'Link' as part of commit which points to > actual ML submission? > > > > Isn't it already documented? > > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > > > > I think it is: > > > > "Be sure to tell the reviewers what changes you are making and to thank them > > for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and > > reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond > > politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next > > version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches > > explaining difference against previous submission > > " > > > > Then: > > > > ''' > > Example of a patch submitted by the From: author:: > > ''' > > > > defines 'changelog' as the block above the signatures. > > > > And > > > > 'The canonical patch format' > > > > also tells that anything after '---' marker line is for > > "Any additional comments not suitable for the changelog." > > > > But well, the important part is to have the version information > > available for reviewers. > > Can still be available below '---' marker. +1 to what Raag said. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko