From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84924CDA12 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792410518; cv=none; b=X3ZQ9RDCMiPRIJBwgIohhMmkU5G2Yr60H8a21APTY57X8Du7i+ldkzAv2I6hgbAsW3zo9wZcPI+QOP7qtvk5kaWmzgIB5tIB0i3AJo2aNO+NyeneP+9x7uoHBurrovrKt0Mv2se4i180AljfiX5/TzfjZGHZLqmqGV7ftCorrLs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792410518; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9PBHGdEHlac5f75hD0X5Vn0eGyRXFg6E3LZ2HD/zV0E=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=I6uZEBbJhjLyaMi3AkU6IMGgk/Q/7iikh1urOHeBRO8aKZr89jbGPokUcaHh9qZ/MN63HvKqUYyAuqLbdS2pwOEP+9ak9qqZL56NsNzWPbG9h/WPPYuUN/ytZHPVXynfmcQKpNcMt5EAzF/t8iJh4QxEJ70hMpI7l5BfuvySdM8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C+2OCNFT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C+2OCNFT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 445AC1F000C4; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:48:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792410517; bh=9PBHGdEHlac5f75hD0X5Vn0eGyRXFg6E3LZ2HD/zV0E=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=C+2OCNFTIX5u2juOSBkpwnW+/+wR8Q1m+kP8tPR+X+cW+1wILSL+Ot1mFGBHXQjZL X0VuJc6iSJTeiKgOjL5jeCRkXboIN2SwhyETxuvbC+dMIGSbv81LMkVQSK/8Zi/bJo Fh+ldHLYJa4ZUn5yuKLnQNnmlYcl//9EqNCotYJYXC4oJwXSzDdPZZOAj8tGGzRB9l uBRNb1Qw16/Deyzd7uY9JkMlc2LR+kYOAUKnRnU6nFwX2KJLBWN1Xpwh9MWNIA848j g41ufro0M5+VQq8ulwktxAMOyj4RQtQqF9XarMJ5lSFp9pHMhHw4eGzwnPJfrnCNkv TD3cb96xaUKlA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] peci: Add support for PECI CC 0x83 retry condition Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Changhuang Liang" Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261019114502.55307-4-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> References: <20261019114502.55307-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> <20261019114502.55307-4-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:48:36 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Some PECI client devices may return completion code 0x83, this > completion code means that a command response is in progress, which > is not currently handled by the driver. >=20 > Add PECI_CC_RESP_IN_PROGRESS definition and map it to -EAGAIN so that > the request will be retried appropriately, similar to other retryable > completion codes (0x80, 0x81, 0x82). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Changhuang Liang Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261019114502.5530= 7-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com?part=3D3