From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: mfd@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2026 22:31:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-192713@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101-xg6846b-bcmbca-xrdp-reset-v2-3-455fe9eed5ee@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mfd: bcmbca_pmc3_pmb: debugfs stall, WARN_ON, and HW read in bcmbca_pmb_regmap_init()
- [Low] mfd: bcmbca_pmc3_pmb: mfd_cell match data and unused drvdata in bcmbca_pmb_probe()
--
commit cbd0d7381d66545c4a7f2cd3781134426406ab49
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
mfd: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport
This commit adds an MFD driver for the Broadcom BCMBCA third generation Power
Management Controller (PMC3) Processor Monitor Bus (PMB) on BCM6846, exposing
a shared regmap to child devices while managing hardware keyhole semaphore
locking and recovery.
> mfd: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport
>
> Add an MFD driver for shared access to the Processor Monitor Bus (PMB)
> of the third generation Power Management Controller (PMC3), initially
> for BCM6846.
>
> Expose an uncached regmap to all children, encoding the bus, device and
> word offset in each register address. Keep keyhole semaphore acquisition
> and transaction recovery inside the MFD driver.
>
> A software timeout does not abort a transaction. If the keyhole is still
> busy, retain its hardware lock and reject new callers until delayed work
> observes completion and releases it.
>
> The keyhole register layout differs from older Broadcom PMB controllers.
> Match only BCM6846 for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/bcmbca_pmc3_pmb.c b/drivers/mfd/bcmbca_pmc3_pmb.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..837143409ce9c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/bcmbca_pmc3_pmb.c
[ ... ]
> +struct bcmbca_pmb_data {
> + const struct mfd_cell *cells;
> + unsigned int num_cells;
> +};
[ ... ]
> +static bool bcmbca_pmb_precious_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + /* Do not let debugfs probe unimplemented or firmware-owned registers. */
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static struct regmap *bcmbca_pmb_regmap_init(struct bcmbca_pmb *pmb)
> +{
> + const struct regmap_config config = {
> + .reg_bits = 32,
> + .val_bits = 32,
> + .reg_stride = 1,
> + .max_register = BCMBCA_PMB_REG(3, 255, 65535),
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> + .precious_reg = bcmbca_pmb_precious_reg,
> + .reg_read = bcmbca_pmb_reg_read,
> + .reg_write = bcmbca_pmb_reg_write,
> + .lock = bcmbca_pmb_regmap_lock,
> + .unlock = bcmbca_pmb_regmap_unlock,
> + .can_sleep = true,
> + .lock_arg = pmb,
> + };
> +
> + return devm_regmap_init(pmb->dev, NULL, pmb, &config);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
What happens when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is enabled and a user reads the regmap
debugfs files (/sys/kernel/debug/regmap/<dev>/registers, range, or access)
with max_register set to BCMBCA_PMB_REG(3, 255, 65535) (0x03ffffff) and
bcmbca_pmb_precious_reg() returning true for all registers?
Because config.max_register is non-zero and readable_reg is unset,
regmap_debugfs_init() creates the registers, range, and access files.
When reading the registers or range file, regmap_debugfs_get_dump_start()
scans from 0 to 0x03ffffff (67,108,864 iterations) under map->cache_lock.
Because every register is marked precious, regmap_printable() returns false
for every address, leaving map->debugfs_off_cache empty and triggering a
WARN_ON on every read:
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-debugfs.c:regmap_debugfs_get_dump_start()
WARN_ON(list_empty(&map->debugfs_off_cache));
ret = base;
Furthermore, regmap_debugfs_get_dump_start() then returns base (0) to
regmap_read_debugfs(), which enters its loop at start_reg = 0 without checking
regmap_printable(map, start_reg) and performs a hardware PMB read of register
0 (bus 0, device 0, offset 0) on the first iteration:
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-debugfs.c:regmap_read_debugfs()
for (i = start_reg; i >= 0 && i <= to;
i = regmap_next_readable_reg(map, i)) {
...
ret = regmap_read(map, i, &val);
Similarly, reading the access debugfs file causes regmap_access_show() to
iterate over all 67,108,864 addresses and call seq_printf() for each one,
repeatedly doubling the seq_file buffer until kvzalloc() fails with -ENOMEM.
Should max_register be left unset in bcmbca_pmb_regmap_init() (removing the
need for bcmbca_pmb_precious_reg()) so regmap_debugfs_init() does not create
the registers, range, and access debugfs files for this sparse 26-bit address
space?
[ ... ]
> +static int bcmbca_pmb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + const struct bcmbca_pmb_data *data = device_get_match_data(dev);
[ ... ]
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmb);
> + pmb->regmap = bcmbca_pmb_regmap_init(pmb);
> + if (IS_ERR(pmb->regmap))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pmb->regmap), "failed to register PMB regmap\n");
> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, data->cells,
> + data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "failed to register PMB functions\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mfd_cell bcm6846_pmb_cells[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "bcm6846-pmb-clock",
> + .of_compatible = "brcm,bcm6846-pmb-clock",
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "bcm6846-pmb-reset",
> + .of_compatible = "brcm,bcm6846-pmb-reset",
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "bcm6846-pmb-pvtmon",
> + .of_compatible = "brcm,bcm6846-pmb-pvtmon",
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct bcmbca_pmb_data bcm6846_pmb_data = {
> + .cells = bcm6846_pmb_cells,
> + .num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(bcm6846_pmb_cells),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id bcmbca_pmb_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm6846-pmb", .data = &bcm6846_pmb_data },
> + { }
> +};
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but in MFD drivers, passing mfd_cell arrays through the
.data field of struct of_device_id is discouraged in favor of either passing
bcm6846_pmb_cells and ARRAY_SIZE(bcm6846_pmb_cells) directly to
devm_mfd_add_devices() while only one compatible is matched, or storing a
device ID enum in .data and selecting the static const mfd_cell array with a
switch in bcmbca_pmb_probe().
Also, are platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmb) and struct bcmbca_pmb::regmap needed
in bcmbca_pmb_probe(), given that struct bcmbca_pmb is private to
drivers/mfd/bcmbca_pmc3_pmb.c and child drivers look up the regmap via
dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL)?
Finally, could the commit subject include the driver prefix to match MFD
conventions (for example, "mfd: bcmbca-pmb: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB
transport")?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261101-xg6846b-bcmbca-xrdp-reset-v2-0-455fe9eed5ee@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 22:14 [PATCH v2 0/7] BCMBCA PMB clock, reset and hardware monitoring support Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: mfd: Describe the BCM6846 PMC complex Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: soc: Describe the BCM6846 Processor Monitor Bus Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] reset: Add BCMBCA block resets through the PMB Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] clk: bcm: Add BCMBCA PMB clocks Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] hwmon: Add Broadcom PMB PVTMON monitoring Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 3:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-11-01 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: dts: broadcom: Add BCM6846 PMB clocks and hardware monitoring Linus Walleij
2026-11-01 22:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] BCMBCA PMB clock, reset and hardware monitoring support William Zhang
2026-11-02 7:50 ` Linus Walleij
2026-11-02 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-192713@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox