From: <mhklkml@zohomail.com>
To: <vdso@mailbox.org>, <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kys@microsoft.com>,
<wei.liu@kernel.org>, <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
<longli@microsoft.com>, <decui@microsoft.com>,
<linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Limit channel interrupt scan to relid high water mark
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:55:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01bb01dca2dd$833a4b20$89aee160$@zohomail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554036576.472972.1771638469213@app.mailbox.org>
From: vdso@mailbox.org <vdso@mailbox.org> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2026 5:48 PM
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Boots for me on an x86_64 machine. Got a typo fix and a question for you.
> Tagging as reviewed and tested regardless :)
>
> > On 02/20/2026 8:40 AM Michael Kelley <mhklkml@zohomail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> >
> > When checking for VMBus channel interrutps, current code always scans the
>
> /s/interrutps/interrupts
>
> > full SynIC receive interrupt bit array to get the relid of the
> > interrupting channels. The array has HV_EVENT_FLAGS_COUNT (2048) bits.
> > But VMs rarely have more than 100 channels, and the relid is typically
> > a small integer that is densely assigned by the Hyper-V host. It's
> > wasteful to scan 2048 bits when it is highly unlikely that anything will
> > be found past bit 100. The waste is double with Confidential VMBus because
> > there are two receive interrupt arrays that must be scanned: one for the
> > hypervisor SynIC and one for the paravisor SynIC.
> >
> > Improve the scanning by tracking the largest relid that has been offered
> > by the Hyper-V host. Then when checking for VMBus channel interrupts, only
> > scan up to this high water mark.
> >
> > When channels are rescinded, it's not worth the complexity to recalculate
> > the high water mark. Hyper-V tends to reuse the rescinded relids for any
> > new channels that are subsequently added, and the performance benefit of
> > exactly tracking the high water mark would be minimal.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
>
> Tested-by: Roman Kisel <vdso@mailbox.org>
> Reviewed-by: Roman Kisel <vdso@mailbox.org>
Thanks!
>
> > ---
> > drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h | 3 ++-
> > drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 7 +------
> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> > index 74fed2c073d4..61f7dffd0f50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> > @@ -384,8 +384,18 @@ static void free_channel(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
> >
> > void vmbus_channel_map_relid(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
> > {
> > - if (WARN_ON(channel->offermsg.child_relid >= MAX_CHANNEL_RELIDS))
> > + u32 new_relid = channel->offermsg.child_relid;
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(new_relid >= MAX_CHANNEL_RELIDS))
> > return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * This function is always called in the tasklet for the connect CPU.
> > + * So updating the relid hiwater mark does not need to be atomic.
> > + */
> > + if (new_relid > READ_ONCE(vmbus_connection.relid_hiwater))
> > + WRITE_ONCE(vmbus_connection.relid_hiwater, new_relid);
> > +
> > /*
> > * The mapping of the channel's relid is visible from the CPUs that
> > * execute vmbus_chan_sched() by the time that vmbus_chan_sched() will
> > @@ -411,9 +421,7 @@ void vmbus_channel_map_relid(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
> > * of the VMBus driver and vmbus_chan_sched() can not run before
> > * vmbus_bus_resume() has completed execution (cf. resume_noirq).
> > */
> > - virt_store_mb(
> > - vmbus_connection.channels[channel->offermsg.child_relid],
> > - channel);
> > + virt_store_mb(vmbus_connection.channels[new_relid], channel);
> > }
> >
> > void vmbus_channel_unmap_relid(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h b/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
> > index 7bd8f8486e85..2c90c81a3b0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
> > @@ -276,8 +276,9 @@ struct vmbus_connection {
> > struct list_head chn_list;
> > struct mutex channel_mutex;
> >
> > - /* Array of channels */
> > + /* Array of channel pointers, indexed by relid */
> > struct vmbus_channel **channels;
> > + u32 relid_hiwater;
> >
> > /*
> > * An offer message is handled first on the work_queue, and then
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > index 3e7a52918ce0..a96da105b593 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > @@ -1258,17 +1258,12 @@ static void vmbus_chan_sched(void *event_page_addr)
> > return;
> > event = (union hv_synic_event_flags *)event_page_addr + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT;
> >
> > - maxbits = HV_EVENT_FLAGS_COUNT;
> > + maxbits = READ_ONCE(vmbus_connection.relid_hiwater) + 1;
>
> Worth checking that "maxbits <= HV_EVENT_FLAGS_COUNT" to protect from
> corruptions, etc. or would be too paranoidal?
We definitely want to validate what Hyper-V returns to the guest as a relid,
and drop any values that are "too big", so we don't go indexing off into
bogus memory. But that validation is done in vmbus_channel_map_relid()
with a WARN_ON() before setting relid_hiwater. So there's no way for
relid_hiwater to be bogus, and additional validation here in
vmbus_chan_sched() really isn't necessary.
Michael
>
> > recv_int_page = event->flags;
> >
> > if (unlikely(!recv_int_page))
> > return;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Suggested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> > - * One possible optimization would be to keep track of the largest relID that's in use,
> > - * and only scan up to that relID.
> > - */
> > for_each_set_bit(relid, recv_int_page, maxbits) {
> > void (*callback_fn)(void *context);
> > struct vmbus_channel *channel;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-21 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 16:40 [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Limit channel interrupt scan to relid high water mark Michael Kelley
2026-02-21 1:47 ` vdso
2026-02-21 2:55 ` mhklkml [this message]
2026-03-12 4:44 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01bb01dca2dd$833a4b20$89aee160$@zohomail.com' \
--to=mhklkml@zohomail.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=vdso@mailbox.org \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox