From: Kimberly Brown <kimbrownkd@gmail.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Cc: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Expose monitor data only when monitor pages are used
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 16:40:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190303214056.GB2071@ubu-Virtual-Machine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR2101MB091825C55612FBCEA3322119D7770@DM5PR2101MB0918.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 06:39:30PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Kimberly Brown <kimbrownkd@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 11:18 AM
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Channel-level attribute_group callback function. Returns the permission for
> > + * each attribute, and returns 0 if an attribute is not visible.
> > + */
> > +static umode_t vmbus_chan_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> > + struct attribute *attr, int idx)
> > +{
> > + const struct vmbus_channel *channel =
> > + container_of(kobj, struct vmbus_channel, kobj);
> > +
> > + /* Hide the monitor attributes if the monitor mechanism is not used. */
> > + if (!channel->offermsg.monitor_allocated &&
> > + (attr == &chan_attr_pending.attr ||
> > + attr == &chan_attr_latency.attr ||
> > + attr == &chan_attr_monitor_id.attr))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return attr->mode;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct attribute_group vmbus_chan_group = {
> > + .attrs = vmbus_chan_attrs,
> > + .is_visible = vmbus_chan_attr_is_visible
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct kobj_type vmbus_chan_ktype = {
> > .sysfs_ops = &vmbus_chan_sysfs_ops,
> > .release = vmbus_chan_release,
> > - .default_attrs = vmbus_chan_attrs,
>
> Just to double-check my understanding, removing the default_attrs
> here means that in vmbus_add_channel_kobj(), the call to
> kobject_init_and_add() will only create the sub-directory that is the
> channel number. The sub-directory will be empty. Then the new
> call to sysfs_create_group() that you added below will populate
> the subdirectory, as filtered by vmbus_chan_attr_is_visible().
Yes, that's my understanding as well.
>
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1571,6 +1624,12 @@ int vmbus_add_channel_kobj(struct hv_device *dev, struct
> > vmbus_channel *channel)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + ret = sysfs_create_group(kobj, &vmbus_chan_group);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("Unable to set up channel sysfs files\n");
> > + return ret;
>
> In this error case, the previously created sub-directory that is the
> channel number needs to be deleted/cleaned up.
I was going to let the kobject and sysfs systems take care of that. If
vmbus_add_channel_kobj() returns an error to the calling functions, they
call kobject_put(), which eventually removes the directory.
There are two functions that call vmbus_add_channel_kobj():
vmbus_add_channel_work() and vmbus_device_register(). If
vmbus_add_channel_kobj() returns an error to vmbus_add_channel_work(),
the function calls are:
free_channel() => kobject_put() (channel kobj ref. count should now be
0) => kobject_release() => kobject_cleanup() => kobject_del() =>
sysfs_remove_dir()
If vmbus_add_channel_kobject() returns an error to
vmbus_device_register(), the device's sub-directory is removed:
device_unregister() => put_device() => kobject_put() (device kobj ref.
count should now be 0) => kobject_release() => ...
So, I don't think its necessary to cleanup the subdirectory created by
kobject_init_and_add() here.
Thanks,
Kim
>
> > + }
> > +
>
> Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-03 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7481d15f52427917a5f620e29308c1aa5c63f3eb.1550554279.git.kimbrownkd@gmail.com>
2019-02-26 5:35 ` [PATCH v3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Expose monitor data when channel uses monitor pages Kimberly Brown
2019-02-26 8:18 ` Greg KH
2019-03-01 19:18 ` [PATCH v4] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Expose monitor data only when monitor pages are used Kimberly Brown
2019-03-02 18:39 ` Michael Kelley
2019-03-03 21:40 ` Kimberly Brown [this message]
2019-03-03 8:05 ` Greg KH
2019-03-03 21:11 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-03-04 7:38 ` Greg KH
2019-03-08 22:46 ` [PATCH v5] " Kimberly Brown
2019-03-09 7:21 ` Greg KH
2019-03-12 0:04 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-03-19 4:04 ` [PATCH v6] " Kimberly Brown
2019-03-19 9:26 ` Greg KH
2019-03-20 20:18 ` Michael Kelley
2019-03-21 3:57 ` Sasha Levin
2019-03-21 15:55 ` Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190303214056.GB2071@ubu-Virtual-Machine \
--to=kimbrownkd@gmail.com \
--cc=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).