From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B88AC28D19 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1D02075C for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="jish6J8M" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726537AbfFETKY (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:10:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:40506 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726707AbfFETKX (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:10:23 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id u17so15396681pfn.7 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 12:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ECON+3GqS4gPhtd0pv7FErM7REhB/G/cWUwMq48vsuw=; b=jish6J8M/xP0Fp6UOlEa+Ly3bbYcg/Q/GGmqjPbTE+LnbRn8KO2KjMTEQGktrU3Y2m fHXFGMy6x4fkSawSJKjjvqoZ4AMdUoWZboAeeGPuer2ukfjUSSvaWsUQf7fRk0KEhH8E L2gaedIJ8fDffWKAqLQgeD9/l2I2RJJRCOAbDM2Ro58QwOWXASbCn6PlyFDzsBahC6kA mRU7YkayEy+tqNIIi+J5osjuxSI6l5pFy9yH7/2goJkrnjWmW4fMCfmFdL7eqgNqFpiw OVKD61ZBQoQE6+qDtOO1GrUZ+/uPugM920SFXc/t1/fn/DmWBVVTUKlMuRt4etA1PR7U AiUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ECON+3GqS4gPhtd0pv7FErM7REhB/G/cWUwMq48vsuw=; b=CJaiQPz43Cn+qjvT+A4g2y7J8Hobgvpx+yY75UvmxbBS6zqbg5WTHG8mHRCZ98Vkrt TP1v1SLm9zUIeWGyPzKrUTstfPUcUDtXvY54Xso2rSiF4vgUsentIrMuKjd7n67BtTsV ZnnCCh17eyUXPg9dmDTGD9LeLZkAwQsXC/RfouSfWA87ZEhuEqncut5U+xMI/upXDyOM +AcEoKCSxBaKpck6rik3I45yU+6u88oG/RF8DxOjXNM62c8p6j3EqYiDuC8qJ6HTkfjr uS9bhtiHHi8VPj+l74kMr+KYsiSIFxYGhjDuhoTPYtSw1PSM9KBhRIywni/HFee4ja1z Xcjw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNx/wRz4vgGWX+VGXidoj3BsoH5bUv5aAjPvxZgSUmZniiZNVP WM3XKGl7qKK0fP5FZoEeSdwwVA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqye5sLFtUV5ShpAXZlEr0EuAV0uNSE4iugyD42OUt69HRIWpRIXqGtLvlM3f2RxFe5+Aa1FUA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5b5c:: with SMTP id l28mr365033pgm.158.1559761822336; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 12:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm18065098pgq.13.2019.06.05.12.10.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 12:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:10:20 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert async probing of VMBus scsi device Message-ID: <20190605121020.1a41b753@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190605190722.GA19684@infradead.org> References: <20190605185205.12583-1-sthemmin@microsoft.com> <20190605185637.GA31439@infradead.org> <20190605120640.00358689@hermes.lan> <20190605190722.GA19684@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-hyperv-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:07:23 -0700 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:06:40PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Which is true for every device, and why we use UUIDs or label for > > > mounts that are supposed to be stable. > > > > Not everyone is smart enough to do that. > > Sure. But they should not get a way out for just one specific driver. There are people running new kernels on 6 year old distributions. Was every distribution smart enough then? If you think so, then this not necessary.