linux-hyperv.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Yanming Liu <yanminglr@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	Andres Beltran <lkmlabelt@gmail.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: account for packet descriptor in maximum packet size
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 05:28:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214042804.GA1934@anparri> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214020658.GA439610@anparri>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:06:58AM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > Truncated packet:
> > module("hv_vmbus").statement("hv_pkt_iter_first@drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c:457"):
> > desc->offset8 = 2, desc->len8 = 514, rbi->pkt_buffer_size = 4096
> > module("hv_vmbus").statement("hv_ringbuffer_read@drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c:382"):
> > desc->offset8 = 2, desc->len8 = 512
> > balloon_onchannelcallback: recvlen = 4080, dm_hdr->type = 8
> > 
> > First garbage packet:
> > module("hv_vmbus").statement("hv_pkt_iter_first@drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c:457"):
> > desc->offset8 = 21, desc->len8 = 16640, rbi->pkt_buffer_size = 4096
> > module("hv_vmbus").statement("hv_ringbuffer_read@drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c:382"):
> > desc->offset8 = 21, desc->len8 = 512
> > balloon_onchannelcallback: recvlen = 3928, dm_hdr->type = 63886
> > 
> > The trace proved my hypothesis above.
> 
> Thanks for the confirmation.
> 
> (Back to "how to fix this" now.) I think that the patch properly addresses
> the "mismatch" between the (maximum) size of the receive buffer (bufferlen
> in vmbus_recvpacket()) and max_pkt_size:
> 
> We've discussed hv_ballon in some:
> 
>   1) drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c:balloon_onchannelcallback()
>      (bufferlen = HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, max_pkt_size = VMBUS_DEFAULT_MAX_PKT_SIZE)
> 
> But I understand that the same mismatch is present *and addressed by your
> patch in the following cases:
> 
>   2) drivers/hv/hv_util.c:{shutdown,timesync,heartbeat}_onchannelcallback()
>      (bufferlen = HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, max_pkt_size = VMBUS_DEFAULT_MAX_PKT_SIZE)
> 
>   3) drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c:hv_fcopy_onchannelcallback()
>      (bufferlen = 2 * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, max_pkt_size = 2 * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE)
> 
>   4) drivers/hv/hv_snapshot.c:hv_vss_onchannelcallback()
>      (bufferlen= 2 * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, max_pkt_size= 2 * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE)
> 
>   5) drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c:hv_kvp_onchannelcallback()
>      (bufferlen= 4 * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, max_pkt_size= 4 * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE)
> 
> In fact, IIUC, similar considerations would apply to hv_fb and hv_drm *if
> it were not for the fact that those drivers seem to have bogus values for
> max_pkt_size:
> 
>   6) drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c
>      (bufferlen = MAX_VMBUS_PKT_SIZE, max_pkt_size=VMBUS_DEFAULT_MAX_PKT_SIZE)
> 
>   7) drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
>      (bufferlen = MAX_VMBUS_PKT_SIZE, max_pkt_size=VMBUS_DEFAULT_MAX_PKT_SIZE)
> 
> So, IIUC, some separate patch is needed in order to "adjust" those values
> (say, by appropriately setting max_pkt_size in synthvid_connect_vsp() and
> in hyperv_connect_vsp()), but I digress.
> 
> Other comments on your patch:
> 
>   a) You mentioned the problem that "pkt_offset may not match the packet
>      descriptor size".  I think this is a real problem.  To address this
>      problem, we can *presumably consider HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE to be a valid
>      upper bound for pkt_offset (and sizeof(struct vmpacket_descriptor))
>      *and increase the value of max_pkt_size by HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE (rather
>      than sizeof(struct vmpacket_descriptor)), like in:
> 
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ int hv_ringbuffer_init(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *ring_info,
>  
>  	/* Initialize buffer that holds copies of incoming packets */
>  	if (max_pkt_size) {
> +		max_pkt_size += HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE;
>  		ring_info->pkt_buffer = kzalloc(max_pkt_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!ring_info->pkt_buffer)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> 
>   b) We may then want to "enforce"/check that that bound on pkt_offset,
> 
>         pkt_offset <= HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
> 
>      is met by adding a corresponding check to the (previously discussed)
>      validation of pkt_offset included in hv_pkt_iter_first(), say:
> 
> @@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ struct vmpacket_descriptor *hv_pkt_iter_first(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
>  	 * If pkt_offset is invalid, arbitrarily set it to
>  	 * the size of vmpacket_descriptor
>  	 */
> -	if (pkt_offset < sizeof(struct vmpacket_descriptor) || pkt_offset > pkt_len)
> +	if (pkt_offset < sizeof(struct vmpacket_descriptor) || pkt_offset > pkt_len ||
> +			pkt_offset > HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE)
>  		pkt_offset = sizeof(struct vmpacket_descriptor);
>  
>  	/* Copy the Hyper-V packet out of the ring buffer */
> 
>      While there (since I have noticed that such validation as well the
>      validation on pkt_len in hv_pkt_iter_first() tend to be the object
>      of a somehow recurring discussion ;/), I wouldn't mind to add some
>      "explicit" debug, pr_err_ratelimited() say, there.
> 
>   c) Last but not least, I'd recommend to pair the above changes or any
>      other change with some inline explanation/comments; these comments
>      could be snippets from an (updated) patch description for example.
> 
>   Andrea

One more thought.  The additional HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE seems unnecessary for
drivers such as hv_netvsc and hv_storvsc, which explicitly account for
pkt_offset in their setting of max_pkt_size, as well as for drivers such
as hv_pci, which uses vmbus_recvpacket_raw().

This suggests an alternative approach: do not increase max_pkt_size in
the generic vmbus code, instead set/adjust max_pkt_size (only) for the
drivers, in (1-7) above, which require the additional HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE
/pkt_offset.  While putting on the driver(s) some additional "burden",
this approach has the advantage of saving some memory (and keeping the
generic code relatively simpler).

Thoughts?

  Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-12 12:13 [PATCH] hv: account for packet descriptor in maximum packet size Yanming Liu
2021-12-13  1:47 ` Andrea Parri
2021-12-13  6:44   ` Yanming Liu
2021-12-13 17:01   ` Yanming Liu
2021-12-14  2:06     ` Andrea Parri
2021-12-14  4:28       ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2021-12-14 16:28         ` Yanming Liu
2021-12-14 21:36           ` Andrea Parri
2021-12-15 12:30             ` Yanming Liu
2021-12-15 14:05               ` Andrea Parri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211214042804.GA1934@anparri \
    --to=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkmlabelt@gmail.com \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=yanminglr@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).