linux-hyperv.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"James Morris" <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"Madhavan T . Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Marco Pagani" <marpagan@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Thara Gopinath" <tgopinath@microsoft.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	"Zahra Tarkhani" <ztarkhani@microsoft.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 8/8] kunit: Add tests for faults
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:04:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229170409.365386-9-mic@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229170409.365386-1-mic@digikod.net>

The first test checks NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would
result as a failed test.

The second and third tests check that read-only data is indeed read-only
and trying to modify it would result as a failed test.

This kunit_x86_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on a
non-x86 native architecture.  It is then skipped on UML because such
test would result to a kernel panic.

Tested with:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_x86_fault

Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
---
 lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
index f7980ef236a3..57d8eff00c66 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 
 #include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
 #include <kunit/device.h>
 
 #include "string-stream.h"
@@ -109,6 +110,117 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_try_catch_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+
+static void kunit_test_null_dereference(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = data;
+	int *null = NULL;
+
+	*null = 0;
+
+	KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_null_dereference(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
+
+	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch,
+			     test,
+			     kunit_test_null_dereference,
+			     kunit_test_catch);
+	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, try_catch->try_result, -EINTR);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX)
+
+const int test_const = 1;
+
+static void kunit_test_const(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = data;
+	/* Bypasses compiler check. */
+	int *ptr = (int *)&test_const;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_const, 1);
+	*ptr = 2;
+
+	KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_const(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
+
+	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, test, kunit_test_const,
+			     kunit_test_catch);
+	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_const, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, try_catch->try_result, -EINTR);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
+}
+
+static int test_rodata __ro_after_init = 1;
+
+static void kunit_test_rodata(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = data;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_rodata, 1);
+	test_rodata = 2;
+
+	KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_rodata(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
+
+	if (!rodata_enabled)
+		kunit_skip(test, "Strict RWX is not enabled");
+
+	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, test, kunit_test_rodata,
+			     kunit_test_catch);
+	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_rodata, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, try_catch->try_result, -EINTR);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
+}
+
+#else /* defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) */
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_rodata(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	kunit_skip(test, "Strict RWX is not supported");
+}
+
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) */
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
+
+static struct kunit_case kunit_x86_fault_test_cases[] = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_fault_null_dereference),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_fault_const),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_fault_rodata),
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kunit_x86_fault_test_suite = {
+	.name = "kunit_x86_fault",
+	.init = kunit_try_catch_test_init,
+	.test_cases = kunit_x86_fault_test_cases,
+};
+
 /*
  * Context for testing test managed resources
  * is_resource_initialized is used to test arbitrary resources
@@ -826,6 +938,7 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_current_test_suite = {
 
 kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite,
 		  &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite,
-		  &kunit_current_test_suite, &kunit_device_test_suite);
+		  &kunit_current_test_suite, &kunit_device_test_suite,
+		  &kunit_x86_fault_test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29 17:04 [PATCH v1 0/8] Run KUnit tests late and handle faults Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] kunit: Run tests when the kernel is fully setup Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:21   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-01  5:29   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-01  7:14   ` David Gow
2024-03-01 19:03     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-01 11:03   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] kunit: Handle thread creation error Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:21   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] kunit: Fix kthread reference Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:22   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] kunit: Fix timeout message Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:22   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] kunit: Handle test faults Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:24   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-01 19:09     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] kunit: Fix KUNIT_SUCCESS() calls in iov_iter tests Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:24   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] kunit: Print last test location on fault Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:26   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-02-29 18:28   ` [PATCH v1 8/8] kunit: Add tests for faults Kees Cook
2024-03-01 19:16     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-01 20:42   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-01  7:15 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] Run KUnit tests late and handle faults David Gow
2024-03-01 19:19   ` Mickaël Salaün

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240229170409.365386-9-mic@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=marpagan@redhat.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tgopinath@microsoft.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ztarkhani@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).