From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDC126280A; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741716864; cv=none; b=JvM2IQfr4M9YGn5ZK+GkpYV//6eK9tHq2sUPIMSy49wlQrsDhUN8uKlme4Cvf915nP1UOhI4XAFE/u501+ozNoFpQsPgN82Eo6KOsdz2LGR3bpTk/dxKyyHCh5OeeOy7mrpX74qpnMyDmGNTSCv6LtJWfNCIQOzq6WQohoSDJMo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741716864; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uLJcJ2E5by7/L+jLn25m72qfzTNr6EIlt9OKOUdIM+8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D9crMSXgyqD3ifAc/FKzdV+Wzj5vL1n4v9Rzqg/ArGr+yPY7ExH0C7AfY4ntm/bQhZri6RSe09mdYVe5I3O0xtIq8U8VA9xZumY0iRK2NNQncwdtsMZ81N9pxlFUoJJZFUs3k4Lz+WPd91Ng92ExH6UckYe8wW8uSa1TwtKVO/k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4ZC203619Lz6HJgy; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:11:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C6B140155; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:14:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:14:20 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:14:18 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner CC: LKML , Marc Zyngier , Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo , "Santosh Shilimkar" , Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , Allen Hubbe , , Bjorn Helgaas , , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , , Wei Huang , Manivannan Sadhasivam , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] genirq/msi: Rename msi_[un]lock_descs() Message-ID: <20250311181418.00002f8f@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250309084110.776899075@linutronix.de> References: <20250309083453.900516105@linutronix.de> <20250309084110.776899075@linutronix.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.183) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:41:58 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Now that all abuse is gone and the legit users are converted to > guard(msi_descs_lock), rename the lock functions and document them as > internal. > > No functional chance. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Sensible. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron