From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
"Santosh Shilimkar" <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>, <ntb@lists.linux.dev>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] genirq/msi: Use lock guards for MSI descriptor locking
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:08:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250312150835.00001851@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87senjz2ar.ffs@tglx>
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 22:26:52 +0100
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11 2025 at 18:00, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:41:44 +0100 (CET)
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> @@ -1037,25 +1032,23 @@ bool msi_create_device_irq_domain(struct
> >> if (msi_setup_device_data(dev))
> >
> > Hmm. We might want to make the docs in cleanup.h more nuanced.
> > They specifically say to not mix goto and auto cleanup, but
> > in the case of scoped_guard() unlikely almost any other case
> > it should be fine.
> >
> >> goto free_fwnode;
>
> I got rid of the gotos. It requires __free() for the two allocations.
That works.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> --- a/include/linux/cleanup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ const volatile void * __must_check_fn(co
>
> #define return_ptr(p) return no_free_ptr(p)
>
> +#define retain_ptr(p) \
> + __get_and_null(p, NULL)
Single line?
This sort of thing got discussed in the past though I doubt I can find
the thread. There was some push back but maybe now is it's time!
Probably worth shouting about it a bit to attract attention. Maybe
a separate patch.
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-09 8:41 [patch 00/10] genirq/msi: Spring cleaning Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 01/10] genirq/msi: Make a few functions static Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 17:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 02/10] genirq/msi: Use lock guards for MSI descriptor locking Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 18:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-11 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-12 15:08 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-03-12 17:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 03/10] soc: ti: ti_sci_inta_msi: Switch MSI descriptor locking to guard() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 18:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-12 17:59 ` Nishanth Menon
2025-03-13 12:07 ` Dhruva Gole
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 04/10] NTB/msi: Switch MSI descriptor locking to lock guard() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-10 15:18 ` Dave Jiang
2025-03-10 16:34 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-03-11 18:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 05/10] PCI/MSI: Switch to MSI descriptor locking to guard() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 18:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-11 21:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-12 15:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 06/10] PCI: hv: Switch " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-10 16:52 ` Wei Liu
2025-03-10 20:33 ` Michael Kelley
2025-03-11 18:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 07/10] PCI/MSI: Provide a sane mechanism for TPH Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 08/10] PCI/TPH: Replace the broken MSI-X control word update Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 09/10] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove the MSI descriptor abuse Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09 8:41 ` [patch 10/10] genirq/msi: Rename msi_[un]lock_descs() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09 8:48 ` Xin Li
2025-03-11 18:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-10 16:51 ` [patch 00/10] genirq/msi: Spring cleaning Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-10 17:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250312150835.00001851@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).