linux-hyperv.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
	"Santosh Shilimkar" <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>, <ntb@lists.linux.dev>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] genirq/msi: Use lock guards for MSI descriptor locking
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:08:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250312150835.00001851@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87senjz2ar.ffs@tglx>

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 22:26:52 +0100
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 11 2025 at 18:00, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun,  9 Mar 2025 09:41:44 +0100 (CET)
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:  
> 
> >>  
> >> @@ -1037,25 +1032,23 @@ bool msi_create_device_irq_domain(struct
> >>  	if (msi_setup_device_data(dev))  
> >
> > Hmm. We might want to make the docs in cleanup.h more nuanced.
> > They specifically say to not mix goto and auto cleanup, but 
> > in the case of scoped_guard() unlikely almost any other case
> > it should be fine.
> >  
> >>  		goto free_fwnode;  
> 
> I got rid of the gotos. It requires __free() for the two allocations.
That works.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx
> ---
> --- a/include/linux/cleanup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ const volatile void * __must_check_fn(co
>  
>  #define return_ptr(p)	return no_free_ptr(p)
>  
> +#define retain_ptr(p)				\
> +	__get_and_null(p, NULL)
Single line?

This sort of thing got discussed in the past though I doubt I can find
the thread. There was some push back but maybe now is it's time!

Probably worth shouting about it a bit to attract attention. Maybe
a separate patch.

Jonathan

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-09  8:41 [patch 00/10] genirq/msi: Spring cleaning Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 01/10] genirq/msi: Make a few functions static Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 17:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 02/10] genirq/msi: Use lock guards for MSI descriptor locking Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 18:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-11 21:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-12 15:08       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-03-12 17:46         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 03/10] soc: ti: ti_sci_inta_msi: Switch MSI descriptor locking to guard() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 18:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-12 17:59   ` Nishanth Menon
2025-03-13 12:07   ` Dhruva Gole
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 04/10] NTB/msi: Switch MSI descriptor locking to lock guard() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-10 15:18   ` Dave Jiang
2025-03-10 16:34   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-03-11 18:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 05/10] PCI/MSI: Switch to MSI descriptor locking to guard() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-11 18:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-11 21:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-12 15:10       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 06/10] PCI: hv: Switch " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-10 16:52   ` Wei Liu
2025-03-10 20:33   ` Michael Kelley
2025-03-11 18:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 07/10] PCI/MSI: Provide a sane mechanism for TPH Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 08/10] PCI/TPH: Replace the broken MSI-X control word update Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 09/10] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove the MSI descriptor abuse Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:41 ` [patch 10/10] genirq/msi: Rename msi_[un]lock_descs() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:48   ` Xin Li
2025-03-11 18:14   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-10 16:51 ` [patch 00/10] genirq/msi: Spring cleaning Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-10 17:31   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250312150835.00001851@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).