public inbox for linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
	Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:45:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917145220.31064-22-jgross@suse.com>

Hi Juergen,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/sched/core]
[also build test WARNING on kvm/queue kvm/next linus/master v6.17-rc6 next-20250917]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core kvm/linux-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Juergen-Gross/x86-paravirt-Remove-not-needed-includes-of-paravirt-h/20250917-230321
base:   tip/sched/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250917145220.31064-22-jgross%40suse.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header
config: x86_64-randconfig-003-20250918 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250918/202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250918/202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c:13:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'native_pv_lock_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      13 | void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
         |             ^
   arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c:13:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
      13 | void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
         | ^
         | static 
   1 warning generated.


vim +/native_pv_lock_init +13 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c

    12	
  > 13	void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
    14	{
    15		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
    16			static_branch_enable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
    17	}
    18	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-17 14:51 [PATCH v2 00/21] paravirt: cleanup and reorg Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] x86/paravirt: Remove not needed includes of paravirt.h Juergen Gross
2025-09-18  3:18   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] x86/paravirt: Move paravirt_sched_clock() related code into tsc.c Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header Juergen Gross
2025-09-18  2:45   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-09-18  5:56     ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-18  5:38   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-20  4:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] paravirt: cleanup and reorg patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
    --cc=alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox