From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
decui@microsoft.com, longli@microsoft.com,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mshv: Add support for integrated scheduler
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:05:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260218080553.GH2236050@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260204071816.GN79272@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2.local>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 07:18:16AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 07:26:06PM +0000, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
> > Query the hypervisor for integrated scheduler support and use it if
> > configured.
> >
> > Microsoft Hypervisor originally provided two schedulers: root and core. The
>
> Microsoft Hypervisor provides three schedulers: root, classic
> (with or without SMT) and core. The latter two are hypervisor based.
>
> > root scheduler allows the root partition to schedule guest vCPUs across
> > physical cores, supporting both time slicing and CPU affinity (e.g., via
> > cgroups). In contrast, the core scheduler delegates vCPU-to-physical-core
> > scheduling entirely to the hypervisor.
> >
> > Direct virtualization introduces a new privileged guest partition type - L1
>
> Level-1 Virtualization Host.
>
> > Virtual Host (L1VH) — which can create child partitions from its own
> > resources. These child partitions are effectively siblings, scheduled by
> > the hypervisor's core scheduler. This prevents the L1VH parent from setting
> > affinity or time slicing for its own processes or guest VPs. While cgroups,
> > CFS, and cpuset controllers can still be used, their effectiveness is
> > unpredictable, as the core scheduler swaps vCPUs according to its own logic
> > (typically round-robin across all allocated physical CPUs). As a result,
> > the system may appear to "steal" time from the L1VH and its children.
> >
> > To address this, Microsoft Hypervisor introduces the integrated scheduler.
> > This allows an L1VH partition to schedule its own vCPUs and those of its
> > guests across its "physical" cores, effectively emulating root scheduler
> > behavior within the L1VH, while retaining core scheduler behavior for the
> > rest of the system.
> >
> > The integrated scheduler is controlled by the root partition and gated by
> > the vmm_enable_integrated_scheduler capability bit. If set, the hypervisor
> > supports the integrated scheduler. The L1VH partition must then check if it
> > is enabled by querying the corresponding extended partition property. If
> > this property is true, the L1VH partition must use the root scheduler
> > logic; otherwise, it must use the core scheduler. This requirement makes
> > reading VMM capabilities in L1VH partition a requirement too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreea Pintilie <anpintil@microsoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> [...]
> > +++ b/include/hyperv/hvhdk_mini.h
> > @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ enum hv_partition_property_code {
> > HV_PARTITION_PROPERTY_PRIVILEGE_FLAGS = 0x00010000,
> > HV_PARTITION_PROPERTY_SYNTHETIC_PROC_FEATURES = 0x00010001,
> >
> > + /* Integrated scheduling properties */
> > + HV_PARTITION_PROPERTY_INTEGRATED_SCHEDULER_ENABLED = 0x00020005,
>
> The internal name is "HvPartitionPropertyHierarchicalIntegratedSchedulerEnabled".
>
> You missed the "Hierarchical" part in the property code name.
>
I attempt to apply this patch and fix these issues. Unfortunately it
doesn't apply cleanly to hyperv-next.
Wei
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 19:26 [PATCH v4] mshv: Add support for integrated scheduler Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-02-04 7:18 ` Wei Liu
2026-02-18 8:05 ` Wei Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260218080553.GH2236050@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2.local \
--to=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox