Linux-HyperV List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] drm/atomic-helpers: Evaluate plane damage after atomic_check
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 19:08:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530190856.E587F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530185716.65688-3-tzimmermann@suse.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Modifying `ignore_damage_clips` after `plane->atomic_check` runs invalidates resource allocations based on partial damage clips, leading to heap buffer overflows.
--

commit 395f91f063087b27412023cba7e5d824633a9392
Author: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

drm/atomic-helpers: Evaluate plane damage after atomic_check

This commit evaluates damage clips after running the atomic_check helpers.
It adds a loop calling drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage() after the
driver's plane and CRTC atomic_check hooks have executed. This allows the
damage handling to account for full modesets triggered by the check hooks.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index 51f39edc31edc..4c37299e8ccb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1065,6 +1065,10 @@ drm_atomic_helper_check_planes(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, i) {
> +		drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage(state, new_plane_state);
> +	}
> +

[Severity: High]
Does modifying ignore_damage_clips after plane->atomic_check has already
run invalidate resource allocations in drivers that use partial damage clips?

For example, in drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/appletbdrm.c:appletbdrm_primary_plane_helper_atomic_check(),
the driver sizes a buffer precisely to the damage clips evaluated during
atomic_check:

	drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init(&iter, old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
	drm_atomic_for_each_plane_damage(&iter, &damage) {
		frames_size += struct_size((struct appletbdrm_frame *)0, buf, rect_size(&damage));
	}
	...
	appletbdrm_state->request = kvzalloc(request_size, GFP_KERNEL);

If a modeset is triggered during the check hooks and this second loop sets
ignore_damage_clips to true, won't drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init() later
return a full-screen damage clip during atomic_update? Could this cause the
driver to copy full-screen damage into the buffer allocated only for partial
damage, resulting in a heap buffer overflow?

I understand this is explicitly acknowledged and fixed later in the patch
series by commit 72afced3e1b6baa294269874c7c4d9d05230889c ('drm/appletbdrm:
Allocate request/response buffers in begin_fb_access').

>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_check_planes);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260530185716.65688-1-tzimmermann@suse.de?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-30 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-30 18:53 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm: Improve logic behind damage handling Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] drm/damage-helper: Do not alter damage clips on modeset, but ignore them Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 19:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] drm/atomic-helpers: Evaluate plane damage after atomic_check Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 19:08   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] drm/ingenic: Remove calls to drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] drm/appletbdrm: Allocate request/response buffers in begin_fb_access Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 19:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] drm/atomic_helper: Do not evaluate plane damage before atomic_check Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] drm/damage-helper: Test src coord in drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_damage() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 19:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] drm/damage-helper: Remove old state from drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] drm/damage-helper: Remove old state from drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 19:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] drm/damage-helper: Rename state parameters in damage helpers Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] drm/vmwgfx: Remove unused field struct vmwgfx_du_update_plane.old_state Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260530190856.E587F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox