From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Runyu Xiao" <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cdx: use generic driver_override infrastructure
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:08:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604040847.529DD1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604035239.1711889-5-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Stale kernel-doc entry for removed `@driver_override` member in `struct cdx_device`.
--
commit c9a2a632f33a0544d4ef0145d2020070218d6838
Author: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
cdx: use generic driver_override infrastructure
This commit switches the CDX subsystem to use the generic driver-core
driver_override infrastructure. It removes the private driver_override
storage and uses device_match_driver_override() to prevent races during
bus matching.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/driver-core/DGRGTIRHA62X.3RY09D9SOK77P@kernel.org/
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h b/include/linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h
> index b1ba97f6c9ad6..f1a107b232daa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h
> @@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ struct cdx_device {
> bool enabled;
> u32 msi_dev_id;
> u32 num_msi;
> - const char *driver_override;
[Severity: Low]
Does this leave a stale kernel-doc entry for @driver_override in the
struct cdx_device documentation block?
The struct documentation still references the removed field:
* @driver_override: driver name to force a match; do not set directly,
* because core frees it; use driver_set_override() to
* set or clear it.
This might trigger an excess kerneldoc parameter warning during the kernel
build (with W=1).
> struct mutex irqchip_lock;
> bool msi_write_pending;
> };
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604035239.1711889-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260602160829.560904-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Convert remaining buses to generic driver_override handling Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] amba: use generic driver_override infrastructure Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] rpmsg: core: " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] vmbus: " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 4:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cdx: " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 4:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604040847.529DD1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox