From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stanislav Kinsburskii" <skinsburskii@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/8] mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:50:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723175030.90BF91F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-hmm-v10-v11-2-c55b003a4b61@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Unconditional dereference of hmm_vma_walk->locked in hmm_do_fault() on VM_FAULT_RETRY causes a kernel panic.
- [High] hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() causes an infinite 100% CPU busy loop on faults that drop the mmap lock (like disk I/O) by unconditionally passing FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY without tracking retries, and continuously resetting the timeout.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v11 2/8] mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support ---
commit 05dcbcb5ba6adcdc92b16e648fa82986518acbaa
Author: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@gmail.com>
mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support
This commit introduces hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() to allow HMM
fault callers to handle mapping faults that drop the mmap_read_lock, such
as userfaultfd regions. It restructures the internal fault loop to track
the lock state and gracefully retry when the lock is dropped.
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -641,6 +651,9 @@ static int hmm_do_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
> unsigned int fault_flags = FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>
> if (hmm_vma_walk->locked)
> fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
[Severity: High]
Does this missing FAULT_FLAG_TRIED tracking cause a livelock on file-backed
faults?
When filemap_fault() sees FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY without FAULT_FLAG_TRIED,
it initiates background I/O, drops the lock, and returns VM_FAULT_RETRY
immediately. Because FAULT_FLAG_TRIED is never set on subsequent retries,
this will continually drop the lock and retry until the I/O completes.
[ ... ]
> for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> vm_fault_t ret;
>
> ret = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr, fault_flags, NULL);
>
> if (ret & (VM_FAULT_COMPLETED | VM_FAULT_RETRY)) {
> *hmm_vma_walk->locked = false;
[Severity: Critical]
If hmm_range_fault() is called, locked is NULL. Can this dereference a NULL
pointer if a fault handler returns VM_FAULT_RETRY?
Even without FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY, some fault handlers (like
exfat_page_mkwrite or BPF arena_vm_fault) return VM_FAULT_RETRY
unconditionally when internal locks fail. If this happens during a legacy
hmm_range_fault() call, *hmm_vma_walk->locked will cause a panic.
[ ... ]
> static int hmm_range_fault_locked(struct hmm_range *range, bool *locked)
> {
> struct hmm_vma_walk hmm_vma_walk = {
> .range = range,
> .locked = locked,
> .last = range->start,
> };
[Severity: High]
When a lock is dropped, the outer function reacquires it and calls
hmm_range_fault_locked() again. Because hmm_vma_walk.last is re-initialized
to range->start on every call, forward progress is lost and the walk
restarts from the beginning of the range.
[ ... ]
> +int hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout(struct hmm_range *range,
> + unsigned long timeout)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + do {
> + /*
> + * If the previous fault dropped mmap_lock, then the fault
> + * handler made progress. Restart the retry timeout in that
> + * case, but keep the existing deadline for ordinary -EBUSY
> + * retries.
> + */
> + if (timeout && !locked)
> + deadline = jiffies + timeout;
[Severity: High]
Coupled with the missing FAULT_FLAG_TRIED logic above, does this continually
reset the timeout?
Since filemap_fault() drops the lock and returns VM_FAULT_RETRY instantly
while waiting for I/O, locked will be false on every iteration. The timeout
deadline will be pushed forward infinitely, creating a 100% CPU busy loop
that entirely bypasses the caller's timeout policy until the I/O finishes.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-hmm-v10-v11-0-c55b003a4b61@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 17:36 [PATCH v11 0/8] mm/hmm: Add mmap lock-drop support for userfaultfd-backed mappings Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 1/8] mm/hmm: move page fault handling out of walk callbacks Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 2/8] mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 3/8] selftests/mm: add HMM test for mmap lock-dropping faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 4/8] mshv: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for region faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 5/8] drm/nouveau: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for SVM faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 6/8] RDMA/umem: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for ODP faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 7/8] accel/amdxdna: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for range population Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:36 ` [PATCH v11 8/8] drm/gpusvm: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for range faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-23 17:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 21:22 ` [PATCH v11 0/8] mm/hmm: Add mmap lock-drop support for userfaultfd-backed mappings Andrew Morton
2026-07-23 22:22 ` Stanislav Kinsburskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723175030.90BF91F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skinsburskii@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox