From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wei Hu" <weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:09:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831120942.9ED911F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831112704.2851147-10-weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing memory decryption for locally allocated L1VH SIRBP in Confidential VMs.
--
commit 0a5809fa9d9b76912e599a03beec81fda2326b1b
Author: Wei Hu <weh@microsoft.com>
mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition
This patch modifies mshv_synic to set up its own SynIC registers on nested
root partitions instead of assuming VMBus has provisioned them. It also
updates the mapping of hypervisor-provided SIMP, SIEFP, and root SIRBP pages
to use MEMREMAP_DEC to support confidential hosts.
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_synic.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_synic.c
> index 0fdbae1e053c3..8470cf958f21b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/mshv_synic.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_synic.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -511,8 +524,8 @@ static int mshv_synic_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
> sirbp.as_uint64 = hv_get_non_nested_msr(HV_MSR_SIRBP);
>
> if (hv_root_partition()) {
> - event_ring_page = memremap(sirbp.base_sirbp_gpa << HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT,
> - HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB);
> + event_ring_page =
> + mshv_synic_map_shared_page(sirbp.base_sirbp_gpa);
>
> if (!event_ring_page)
> goto cleanup_siefp;
[Severity: High]
Since this patch adds support for confidential hosts by mapping
hypervisor-provided pages with MEMREMAP_DEC, what happens to the locally
allocated SIRBP in the else branch for L1VH partitions?
If we look further down in mshv_synic_cpu_init():
} else {
/*
* On L1VH the hypervisor does not provide a SIRBP page.
* Allocate one and program its GPA into the MSR.
*/
event_ring_page = (struct hv_synic_event_ring_page *)
get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
In a Confidential VM, memory allocated via get_zeroed_page() is encrypted by
default. Because set_memory_decrypted() is never called here, will the
hypervisor be unable to access the event ring, causing a regression in event
delivery for L1VH?
For comparison, drivers/hv/hv.c decrypts its locally allocated SynIC pages
via hv_alloc_page(..., decrypt=true, ...).
[ ... ]
> @@ -595,8 +608,7 @@ static int mshv_synic_cpu_exit(unsigned int cpu)
> struct hv_message_page *msg_page;
> struct hv_synic_event_flags_page *event_flags_page;
> struct hv_synic_event_ring_page *event_ring_page;
> - /* VMBus owns SIMP/SIEFP/SCONTROL when it is active */
> - bool vmbus_active = hv_vmbus_exists();
> + bool vmbus_active = mshv_synic_vmbus_owns_registers();
>
> msg_page = READ_ONCE(spages->hyp_synic_message_page);
> event_flags_page = READ_ONCE(spages->synic_event_flags_page);
[Severity: High]
If the allocation in mshv_synic_cpu_init() is updated to decrypt the page,
does the cleanup path in mshv_synic_cpu_exit() need a corresponding change?
Looking at the cleanup path in mshv_synic_cpu_exit():
if (event_ring_page) {
if (hv_root_partition())
memunmap(event_ring_page);
else
free_page((unsigned long)event_ring_page);
}
If the page is decrypted during initialization, will freeing it here without
first calling set_memory_encrypted() return a decrypted page to the kernel
allocator and cause a memory corruption regression?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831112704.2851147-1-weh@linux.microsoft.com?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 4:04 [PATCH v3 0/7] mshv: add SEV-SNP support for MSHV root partitions Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mshv: add SEV-SNP UAPI definitions Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mshv: add SEV-SNP PSP request hypercall Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mshv: add SEV-SNP isolated page hypercalls Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mshv: wire SEV-SNP partition ioctls Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mshv: use safe partition CPU feature defaults Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:04 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition Wei Hu
2026-08-25 4:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] mshv: add SEV-SNP support for MSHV root partitions Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] mshv: retain memory regions until unmap succeeds Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 12:04 ` [EXTERNAL] " Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] mshv: clear SynIC mappings before freeing them Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] mshv: add SEV-SNP UAPI definitions Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mshv: add SEV-SNP PSP request hypercall Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] mshv: add SEV-SNP isolated page hypercalls Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] mshv: wire SEV-SNP partition ioctls Wei Hu
2026-08-31 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] mshv: use safe partition CPU feature defaults Wei Hu
2026-08-31 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition Wei Hu
2026-08-31 12:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831120942.9ED911F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=weh@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox