From: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Cc: "apais@microsoft.com" <apais@microsoft.com>,
"benhill@microsoft.com" <benhill@microsoft.com>,
"bperkins@microsoft.com" <bperkins@microsoft.com>,
"sunilmut@microsoft.com" <sunilmut@microsoft.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"decui@microsoft.com" <decui@microsoft.com>,
"haiyangz@microsoft.com" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"mikelley@microsoft.com" <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"tiala@microsoft.com" <tiala@microsoft.com>,
"wei.liu@kernel.org" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hyperv-next v3] x86/hyperv: Fix APIC ID and VP index confusion in hv_snp_boot_ap()
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:15:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50dd72d6-6e12-4b0e-954d-5b7e57fd02fb@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB4157F5E0375016711820D2FBD4832@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On 4/29/2025 8:42 PM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 11:27 AM
>>
>> To start an application processor in SNP-isolated guest, a hypercall
>> is used that takes a virtual processor index. The hv_snp_boot_ap()
>> function uses that START_VP hypercall but passes as VP index to it
>> what it receives as a wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 callback: the APIC ID.
>>
>> As those two aren't generally interchangeable, that may lead to hung
>> APs if the VP index and the APIC ID don't match up.
>>
>> Update the parameter names to avoid confusion as to what the parameter
>> is. Use the APIC ID to the VP index conversion to provide the correct
>> input to the hypercall.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 44676bb9d566 ("x86/hyperv: Add smp support for SEV-SNP guest")
>> Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> [V3]
>> - Removed the misleading comment about the APIC ID and VP indices.
>> - Removed the not sufficiently founded if statement that was added
>> to the previous version of the patch to avoid the O(n) time complexity.
>> I'll follow up with a separate patch to address that as that pattern
>> has crept into other places in the code in the AP wakeup path.
>> - Fixed the logging message to use the "VP index" terminology
>> consistently.
>> ** Thank you, Michael! **
>>
>> [V2]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/20250425213512.1837061-1-romank@linux.microsoft.com/
>> - Fixed the terminology in the patch and other code to use
>> the term "VP index" consistently
>> ** Thank you, Michael! **
>>
>> - Missed not enabling the SNP-SEV options in the local testing,
>> and sent a patch that breaks the build.
>> ** Thank you, Saurabh! **
>>
>> - Added comments and getting the Linux kernel CPU number from
>> the available data.
>>
>> [V1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/20250424215746.467281-1-romank@linux.microsoft.com/
>> ---
>> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c | 44 +++++----------------------------
>> arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c | 22 +++++++++++++++--
>> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 6 +++--
>> include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks for fixing the terminology, in addition to fixing the bug that is your original
> purpose for the patch.
Thanks for your support and feedback :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
--
Thank you,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 18:27 [PATCH hyperv-next v3] x86/hyperv: Fix APIC ID and VP index confusion in hv_snp_boot_ap() Roman Kisel
2025-04-30 3:42 ` Michael Kelley
2025-04-30 15:15 ` Roman Kisel [this message]
2025-05-06 6:28 ` Wei Liu
2025-05-06 15:46 ` Roman Kisel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50dd72d6-6e12-4b0e-954d-5b7e57fd02fb@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=romank@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=apais@microsoft.com \
--cc=benhill@microsoft.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bperkins@microsoft.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sunilmut@microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiala@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).