From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: apais@microsoft.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
hargar@microsoft.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, ssengar@linux.microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
cho@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: microsoft: Add vmbus message-connection-id property
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:18:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d3b5d1e-de1b-4d3b-ba14-7029c51b8e05@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1753240089-29558-1-git-send-email-hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
On 23/07/2025 05:08, Hardik Garg wrote:
>> Host is supposed to have multiple guests, so this feels like you are
>> going to prepare for each guest different DTS with different connection
>> ID. This feels like poor design. DTS is supposed to be relatively static
>> configuration, not runtime choice vmguestid+1.
>
>> The guest cannot access other configuration channels, can it? If it can,
>> it would mean it can eavesdrop on other guests? So obviously it cannot.
>> Therefore from guest point of view this is completely redundant. Guest
>> cannot use any other value, thus guest should not configure it. The
>> guest has only one channel and uses only this one which gets to right
>> place to the host.
>
> Thank you for your feedback. Let me explain the connection ID in more detail:
>
> 1. Message Port Architecture:
> - The connection ID specifies which Hyper-V hypervisor message port (mailbox slot) to use for communication between the host and guest
> - The hypervisor has multiple message ports, but historically VMBus only used one
> - With the introduction of VTL2 (Virtual Trust Level 2), the control plane can now be hosted in VTL2, requiring different message ports for communication
>
> 2. Control Plane Communication:
> - The VMBus control plane on the host needs to communicate with the VMBus driver in the guest
> - When the control plane is hosted in VTL2, it requires a different message port than the standard communication path
> - The connection ID tells the guest whether to use the standard or alternate message port for this control plane communication
>
> 3. Message Processing:
> - Each message is tagged with an ID
> - If the guest uses an incorrect ID, the host won't recognize the message and will drop it
> - This is not about choosing between multiple available channels - it's about using the correct mailbox slot for communication
>
Don't paste me specs in response to questions, but answer specific
questions.
> 4. Security and Isolation:
> - Each guest has its private hypervisor mailbox
> - Multiple guests using the same connection ID cannot interfere with each other
Then all guests can use the same value, 0, making this property redundant.
> - The connection ID is more like a "root ID" that helps enumerate devices on the bus, not a channel selector between guests
>
> 5. Dynamic Nature:
> - The connection ID is specified when the guest starts running
> - The host can change it during VM lifecycle events (reset/reboot)
So not suitable for DT. DT is a static data. You cannot just keep
changing existing DT to match whatever you want runtime.
> - This is why the VMBus driver needs to know the connection ID every time the kernel starts
> - The ID might be different from what it was during the last guest run
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-23 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 23:06 [PATCH v4 0/2] vmbus: Add DeviceTree support for message connection-id Hardik Garg
2025-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: microsoft: Add vmbus message-connection-id property Hardik Garg
2025-06-20 7:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-14 7:48 ` Hardik Garg
2025-07-14 7:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-16 4:42 ` Hardik Garg
2025-07-16 14:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-23 3:08 ` Hardik Garg
2025-07-23 6:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-07-24 22:12 ` Hardik Garg
2025-07-25 7:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] vmbus: retrieve connection-id from DeviceTree Hardik Garg
2025-06-20 2:36 ` Michael Kelley
2025-06-20 7:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d3b5d1e-de1b-4d3b-ba14-7029c51b8e05@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=apais@microsoft.com \
--cc=cho@microsoft.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hargar@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=hargar@microsoft.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ssengar@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).