From: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:11:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80785a3bccc6505c28c71271b004e0b5f3fd3b3f.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723165134.618071F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 16:51 +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
> issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Kernel panic in fc_eh_timed_out() due to missing NULL check
> for fc_rport, contradicting the v2 changelog claim.
> - [High] Use-After-Free race condition in fc_user_scan_tgt due to
> unpinned rport pointer.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all
> Hyper-V targets ---
> commit 7a84d34942989f4df1a7195141939c24f221c9ea
> Author: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
>
> scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets
>
> This patch provides a storvsc-specific user_scan callback that uses
> the
> exported scsi_scan_target() interface to allow explicit scanning of
> targets
> without requiring synthetic fc_rports for each target.
>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Replace the private, unexported scsi_scan_host_selected() helper
> > with
> > the exported scsi_scan_target() interface.
> > - Preserve wildcard channel and target scan behavior.
> > - Verify that storvsc_eh_timed_out() does not use the FC error-
> > handler
> > helpers; the reported missing-rport dereference is not present.
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is the v2 changelog
> accurate
> regarding storvsc_eh_timed_out()?
>
> Looking at storvsc_eh_timed_out() in drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c, it
> appears
> to explicitly route I/O timeouts to the FC transport error handler:
>
> if (scmnd->device->host->transportt == fc_transport_template)
> return fc_eh_timed_out(scmnd);
>
> When fc_eh_timed_out() handles this, it extracts the fc_rport
> pointer:
>
> struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(scmd->device));
> if (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED)
>
> Because storvsc targets are created without an intermediate fc_rport
> parent,
> starget_to_rport() returns NULL. Does this mean fc_eh_timed_out()
> will
> immediately dereference a NULL pointer during an I/O timeout?
>
>
> As a related observation on the FC transport layer scan paths:
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does fc_user_scan_tgt() have a race
> condition that could lead to a use-after-free?
>
> In drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c:fc_user_scan_tgt(), the host lock
> is
> dropped before scanning the target:
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> scsi_scan_target(&rport->dev, channel, id, lun,
> SCSI_SCAN_MANUAL);
>
> If a concurrent FC link down event or port removal triggers
> fc_rport_final_delete(), can the rport device be removed and freed
> before
> or during the scsi_scan_target() execution? If so, should a reference
> be
> acquired on rport->dev prior to dropping the lock?
I do not see any of F/C related calls in what I modified or in the code
I worked on so for me v2 is the correct and final version of this.
Thanks
Laurence
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 16:37 [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scans for all Hyper-V targets Laurence Oberman
2026-07-23 16:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 18:11 ` Laurence Oberman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80785a3bccc6505c28c71271b004e0b5f3fd3b3f.camel@redhat.com \
--to=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox