From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/26] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Expose access to debug MSRs in the partition privilege flags
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:20:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rnltw7b.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yv5XPnSRwKduznWI@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> For some features, Hyper-V spec defines two separate CPUID bits: one
>> listing whether the feature is supported or not and another one showing
>> whether guest partition was granted access to the feature ("partition
>> privilege mask"). 'Debug MSRs available' is one of such features. Add
>> the missing 'access' bit.
>>
>> Note: hv_check_msr_access() deliberately keeps checking
>> HV_FEATURE_DEBUG_MSRS_AVAILABLE bit instead of the new HV_ACCESS_DEBUG_MSRS
>> to not break existing VMMs (QEMU) which only expose one bit. Normally, VMMs
>> should set either both these bits or none.
>
> This is not the right approach long term. If KVM absolutely cannot unconditionally
> switch to checking HV_ACCESS_DEBUG_MSRS because it would break QEMU users, then we
> should add a quirk, but sweeping the whole thing under the rug is wrong.
>
First, this patch is kind of unrelated to the series so in case it's the
only thing which blocks it from being merged -- let's just pull it out
and discuss separately.
My personal opinion is that in this particular case we actually can
switch to checking HV_ACCESS_DEBUG_MSRS and possibly backport this patch
to stable@ and be done with it as SynDBG is a debug feature which is not
supposed to be used much in the wild. This, however, will not give us
much besides 'purity' in KVM as no sane VMM is supposed to set just one
of the HV_FEATURE_DEBUG_MSRS_AVAILABLE/HV_ACCESS_DEBUG_MSRS bits. TL;DR:
I'm not against the change.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 16:07 [PATCH v5 00/26] KVM: VMX: Support updated eVMCSv1 revision + use vmcs_config for L1 VMX MSRs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 01/26] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Expose access to debug MSRs in the partition privilege flags Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-18 15:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-18 15:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-08-18 15:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-18 15:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 02/26] x86/hyperv: Fix 'struct hv_enlightened_vmcs' definition Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 03/26] x86/hyperv: Update " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-18 15:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-18 15:29 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-18 17:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 9:18 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-22 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 16:21 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-22 17:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 17:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-22 18:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-23 7:33 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-23 15:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-23 15:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-23 16:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-23 20:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 16:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 16:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 04/26] KVM: VMX: Define VMCS-to-EVMCS conversion for the new fields Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 05/26] KVM: nVMX: Support several new fields in eVMCSv1 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 06/26] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Cache HYPERV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES CPUID leaf Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 07/26] KVM: selftests: Add ENCLS_EXITING_BITMAP{,HIGH} VMCS fields Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 08/26] KVM: selftests: Switch to updated eVMCSv1 definition Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 09/26] KVM: VMX: nVMX: Support TSC scaling and PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL with enlightened VMCS Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-18 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 8:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-19 17:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 8:47 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-22 16:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-22 17:49 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-18 17:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 7:42 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-19 14:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 15:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 10/26] KVM: selftests: Enable TSC scaling in evmcs selftest Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 11/26] KVM: VMX: Get rid of eVMCS specific VMX controls sanitization Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 12/26] KVM: VMX: Check VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE in setup_vmcs_config() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 13/26] KVM: VMX: Check CPU_BASED_{INTR,NMI}_WINDOW_EXITING " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 14/26] KVM: VMX: Tweak the special handling of SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 15/26] KVM: VMX: Don't toggle VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE for 32-bit kernels/KVM Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 16/26] KVM: VMX: Extend VMX controls macro shenanigans Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 17/26] KVM: VMX: Move CPU_BASED_CR8_{LOAD,STORE}_EXITING filtering out of setup_vmcs_config() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 18/26] KVM: VMX: Add missing VMEXIT controls to vmcs_config Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 19/26] KVM: VMX: Add missing CPU based VM execution " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 20/26] KVM: VMX: Adjust CR3/INVPLG interception for EPT=y at runtime, not setup Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 21/26] KVM: x86: VMX: Replace some Intel model numbers with mnemonics Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 22/26] KVM: VMX: Move LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL errata handling out of setup_vmcs_config() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-18 17:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 7:48 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 23/26] KVM: nVMX: Always set required-1 bits of pinbased_ctls to PIN_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 24/26] KVM: nVMX: Use sanitized allowed-1 bits for VMX control MSRs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 25/26] KVM: VMX: Cache MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC in vmcs_config Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-08-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 26/26] KVM: nVMX: Use cached host MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC value for setting up nested MSR Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rnltw7b.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).