From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 433611BD9CE; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752865738; cv=none; b=eYtSymQgaKiLycf0lqcVdCD9LysKaWW608DorbbdZjNusL3cfWwLrhFSghVlsVnq3ZTh0bbpmKMb38CwXiAJ2ZJNLu4Z2nN+kLko79lQwKBeq1PrLM+Ili5lSmuJk7DaSXtnbDkAsBGDNAcI+vpifUTht5mKOqwALATvQMW7dkY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752865738; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Pzo0MPLwRuN97EgZNXgPSWUy4Yzutdk0XtSOSJtCt3I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FifmZx7QAjLikCS+RO5saXTaGgVGdiOz7+67bCk+sLLlBHNMBr+fgk6SpcgUMyLVqZWScCQ9tC9Rf7YAr6OiNKAQ2K+VPgX1UTQxABNOZO2IkBJssX4Ht3gX70zaLIl0URFSHuHGorxG0uQdUW/LU3Y4XCLiW5FLWv1AXQwp5RM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=eQgNWxYs; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=m+OhRVKV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="eQgNWxYs"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="m+OhRVKV" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1752865735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V8r0rppQDHjmVj5vpwx1UbfKmxxZSTrgp9dHaxLIUl0=; b=eQgNWxYs+OojHD+P4Y1lNYA8nRl5EISY6uS6cqMouXjIGvt+LNNCxD9Bv33JF/C9eJwP4m PejkT4DeABC0wS9fPw4ek3ZwooVD6hw9FViB1Rt7mmMQLLF7KXhqMjYX6xQzbi2g5ID+82 R7nTI5Pnq2Ar8eoCAp54bxJBiFH4lycI0dydQHgKtp/UH4UA3IPnVdxOzc6uoCzi2E1cfw w5tYmH8AvO4G3Mnm3KM+zfrIRZkG/OateibkA3uWWU62d+DZUtsYQAp4p/i8XCNtQxY+p9 xKSpGvh9YO1A70EB4rjqEHtq5E8mOFK8OK8uFfEJoCShouTipxXGbrXDuSYPxg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1752865735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V8r0rppQDHjmVj5vpwx1UbfKmxxZSTrgp9dHaxLIUl0=; b=m+OhRVKVyGPBAoU1FI4VZsqfXYJT7bEeg+oYz4dbu3jWHWOXg1rwQrWX2fPXtsN9W0t7p+ 3oTM5Jo57mdII3AQ== To: Nuno Das Neves , Wei Liu , Nam Cao Cc: "K . Y . Srinivasan" , Marc Zyngier , Haiyang Zhang , Dexuan Cui , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/hyperv: Switch to msi_create_parent_irq_domain() In-Reply-To: References: <5c0ada725449176dfeeb1f7aa98c324066c39d2c.1751277765.git.namcao@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:08:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87cy9xwc3d.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jul 15 2025 at 12:09, Nuno Das Neves wrote: > On 7/9/2025 4:40 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >> CC Nuno who is also touching on this file. >> >> Nam, thanks for this patch. >> >> Nuno's patches fix a few bugs with the current implementation. I expect >> those patches to have contextual conflicts with this patch. I would like >> to commit Nuno's patches first since those are bug fixes, and then >> circle back to this one. >> >> Nuno, can you please review this patch? >> > > I don't think I can give a Reviewed-by since I don't have the context > for these changes. The cover letter provides the information along with a link for deeper information: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1751277765.git.namcao@linutronix.de > It doesn't look like this conflicts with the changes in my patches. It might not look like it, but reality tells a different story: Applying patch _PATCH_v2_2_2_x86_hyperv_Switch_to_msi_create_parent_irq_domain_.patch patching file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 10. Hunk #2 FAILED at 276. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c patching file drivers/hv/Kconfig Hunk #1 FAILED at 10. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/hv/Kconfig Nam, can you please redo the patch against the hyperv tree? Thanks, tglx