From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Replace the per-CPU channel lists with a global array of channels
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:56:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wo6wy5w4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403133826.GA25401@andrea>
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:45:54PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but currently vmbus_chan_sched() accesses
>> >> per-cpu list of channels on the same CPU so we don't need a spinlock to
>> >> guarantee that during an interrupt we'll be able to see the update if it
>> >> happened before the interrupt (in chronological order). With a global
>> >> list of relids, who guarantees that an interrupt handler on another CPU
>> >> will actually see the modified list?
>> >
>> > Thanks for pointing this out!
>> >
>> > The offer/resume path presents implicit full memory barriers, program
>> > -order after the array store which should guarantee the visibility of
>> > the store to *all* CPUs before the offer/resume can complete (c.f.,
>> >
>> > tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt, Sect. #13
>> >
>> > and assuming that the offer/resume for a channel must complete before
>> > the corresponding handler, which seems to be the case considered that
>> > some essential channel fields are initialized only later...)
>> >
>> > IIUC, the spin lock approach you suggested will work and be "simpler";
>> > an obvious side effect would be, well, a global synchronization point
>> > in vmbus_chan_sched()...
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> This is, of course, very theoretical as if we're seeing an interrupt for
>> a channel at the same time we're writing its relid we're already in
>> trouble. I can, however, try to suggest one tiny improvement:
>
> Indeed. I think the idea (still quite informal) is that:
>
> 1) the mapping of the channel relid is propagated to (visible from)
> all CPUs before add_channel_work is queued (full barrier in
> queue_work()),
>
> 2) add_channel_work is queued before the channel is opened (aka,
> before the channel ring buffer is allocate/initalized and the
> OPENCHANNEL msg is sent and acked from Hyper-V, cf. OPEN_STATE),
>
> 3) the channel is opened before Hyper-V can start sending interrupts
> for the channel, and hence before vmbus_chan_sched() can find the
> channel relid in recv_int_page set,
>
> 4) vmbus_chan_sched() finds the channel's relid in recv_int_page
> set before it search/load from the channel array (full barrier
> in sync_test_and_clear_bit()).
>
> This is for the "normal"/not resuming from hibernation case; for the
> latter, notice that:
>
> a) vmbus_isr() (and vmbus_chan_sched()) can not run until when
> vmbus_bus_resume() has finished (@resume_noirq callback),
>
> b) vmbus_bus_resume() can not complete before nr_chan_fixup_on_resume
> equals 0 in check_ready_for_resume_event().
>
> (and check_ready_for_resume_event() does also provides a full barrier).
>
> If makes sense to you, I'll try to add some of the above in comments.
>
It does, thank you!
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-03 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 22:54 [RFC PATCH 00/11] VMBus channel interrupt reassignment Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Always handle the VMBus messages on CPU0 Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 18:50 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Don't bind the offer&rescind works to a specific CPU Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:16 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-26 15:47 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-26 17:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 17:08 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-29 3:43 ` Michael Kelley
2020-03-30 12:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-03 12:04 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Replace the per-CPU channel lists with a global array of channels Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:31 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-26 17:05 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-26 17:43 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 18:21 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-29 3:49 ` Michael Kelley
2020-03-30 12:45 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-03 13:38 ` Andrea Parri
2020-04-03 14:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] hv_netvsc: Disable NAPI before closing the VMBus channel Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 15:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-26 17:55 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] hv_utils: Always execute the fcopy and vss callbacks in a tasklet Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use a spin lock for synchronizing channel scheduling vs. channel removal Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] PCI: hv: Prepare hv_compose_msi_msg() for the VMBus-channel-interrupt-to-vCPU reassignment functionality Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove the unused HV_LOCALIZED channel affinity logic Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Synchronize init_vp_index() vs. CPU hotplug Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Introduce the CHANNELMSG_MODIFYCHANNEL message type Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 18:48 ` Andrea Parri
2020-04-03 14:55 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] scsi: storvsc: Re-init stor_chns when a channel interrupt is re-assigned Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-30 16:42 ` Michael Kelley
2020-03-30 18:55 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-30 19:49 ` Michael Kelley
2020-04-03 13:41 ` Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wo6wy5w4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).