From: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/apic: Fix lost IRQ during forced vector migration on Hyper-V
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:44:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9739e095-9696-412b-adaa-2c37ef630bdf@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y0f3jhd6.ffs@fw13>
On 7/22/2026 6:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Naman!
>
> On Wed, Jul 22 2026 at 14:59, Naman Jain wrote:
>> I completely agree with your comments, and now that I know how to fix
>> this, do you suggest me to -
>>
>> 1. add irq_retrigger callback in pci-hyperv.c
>> or
>> 2. go with your fixup-irq() change to no longer need drivers to add the
>> above? And then see what all stale irq_retrigger inits can be removed
>>
>> Going with 1) would be easier for me to fix this bug, and back port it
>> to older kernels, with proper Fixes tag (pointing to some pci-hyperv.c
>> change).
>> Then later, we can go with 2) separately as a general enhancement (not a
>> Fix).
>
> This should be one patch series:
>
> 1) Add the callback to pci-hyperv, i.e. in hv_pcie_init_dev_msi_info()
>
> + chip->irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy;
>
> That sets it on the outermost domain interrupt chip (PCI/MSI
> device domain), which is what fixup_irqs() looks at.
>
> This one needs a Fixes: tag (The first commit which introduced the
> driver) and a Cc: stable@... so it will be backported.
>
> 2) Change fixup_irqs() to use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy()
>
> Feel free to pick up the patch I gave you, add a proper change log
> and a Suggested-by: Thomas .... tag.
>
> 3) Remove the initialization of the outermost chip from arch/x86/* and
> drivers/iommu/amd/* as that's not longer required then.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Understood. Thanks.
Regards,
Naman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 5:40 [RFC PATCH] x86/apic: Fix lost IRQ during forced vector migration on Hyper-V Naman Jain
2026-07-16 1:17 ` Long Li
2026-07-21 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-22 9:29 ` Naman Jain
2026-07-22 13:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-22 15:14 ` Naman Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9739e095-9696-412b-adaa-2c37ef630bdf@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox