Linux-HyperV List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
To: Michael Schierl <schierlm@gmx.de>,
	Jean DELVARE <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Early kernel panic in dmi_decode when running 32-bit kernel on Hyper-V on Windows 11
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:32:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR02MB4157337ED192FFBA81A9CDD0D40D2@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <938f6eda-f62c-457f-bc42-b2d12fc6e2c7@gmx.de>

From: Michael Schierl <schierlm@gmx.de> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 1:47 PM
> Am 19.04.2024 um 18:36 schrieb Michael Kelley:
> 
> >> I still want to understand why 32-bit Linux is taking an oops during
> >> boot while 64-bit Linux does not.
> >
> > The difference is in this statement in dmi_save_devices():
> >
> > 	count = (dm->length - sizeof(struct dmi_header)) / 2;
> >
> > On a 64-bit system, count is 0xFFFFFFFE.  That's seen as a
> > negative value, and the "for" loop does not do any iterations. So
> > nothing bad happens.
> >
> > But on a 32-bit system, count is 0x7FFFFFFE. That's a big
> > positive number, and the "for" loop iterates to non-existent
> > memory as Michael Schierl originally described.
> >
> > I don't know the "C" rules for mixed signed and unsigned
> > expressions, and how they differ on 32-bit and 64-bit systems.
> > But that's the cause of the different behavior.
> 
> Probably lots of implementation defined behaviour here. But when looking
> at gcc 12.2 for x86/amd64 architecture (which is the version in Debian),
> it is at least apparent from the assembly listing:
> 
> https://godbolt.org/z/he7MfcWfE 
> 
> First of all (this gets me every time): sizeof(int) is 4 on both 32-and
> 64-bit, unlike sizeof(uintptr_t), which is 8 on 64-bit.
> 
> Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions zero-extend the value of dm->length from
> 8 bits to 32 bits (or actually native bitlength as the upper 32 bits of
> rax get set to zero whenever eax is assigned), and then the subtraction
> and shifting (division) happen as native unsigend type, taking only the
> lowest 32 bits of the result as value for count. In the 64-bit case one
> of the extra leading 1 bits from the subtraction gets shifted into the
> MSB of the result, while in the 32-bit case it remains empty.

Yep -- makes sense.  As you said, the sub-expression
(dm->length - sizeof(struct dmi_header)) is unsigned with a size that
is the size we're compiling for.  When compiling for 32-bit, the right shift
puts a zero in the upper bit (bit 31) because the value is treated as
unsigned. But when compiling for 64-bit, bits [63:32] exist and they
are all ones.  The right shift puts the zero in bit 63, and bit 32 (a "1")
gets shifted into bit 31.

Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-13 13:06 Early kernel panic in dmi_decode when running 32-bit kernel on Hyper-V on Windows 11 Michael Schierl
2024-04-15  3:17 ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-15 21:03   ` Michael Schierl
2024-04-15 23:31     ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-16 21:24       ` Michael Schierl
2024-04-16 23:20         ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-17  9:43           ` Jean DELVARE
2024-04-17 15:51             ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-17 21:08             ` Michael Schierl
2024-04-17 22:34               ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-19 16:36                 ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-19 20:47                   ` Michael Schierl
2024-04-19 22:32                     ` Michael Kelley [this message]
2024-05-02 17:02                     ` Michael Kelley
2024-05-03  9:49                       ` Jean DELVARE
2024-04-15 20:15 ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR02MB4157337ED192FFBA81A9CDD0D40D2@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schierlm@gmx.de \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox