From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Cc: "lirongqing@baidu.com" <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"wei.liu@kernel.org" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents/drivers/i8253: Do not zero timer counter in shutdown
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:04:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+O56OXIuARBhsg2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR21MB168840B3814336ED510845C0D7D89@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: lirongqing@baidu.com <lirongqing@baidu.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 5:15 PM
> >
> > Zeroing the counter register in pit_shutdown() isn't actually supposed to
> > stop it from counting, will causes the PIT to start running again,
> > From the spec:
> >
> > The largest possible initial count is 0; this is equivalent to 216 for
> > binary counting and 104 for BCD counting.
> >
> > The Counter does not stop when it reaches zero. In Modes 0, 1, 4, and 5 the
> > Counter "wraps around" to the highest count, either FFFF hex for binary
> > count- ing or 9999 for BCD counting, and continues counting.
> >
> > Mode 0 is typically used for event counting. After the Control Word is
> > written, OUT is initially low, and will remain low until the Counter
> > reaches zero. OUT then goes high and remains high until a new count or a
> > new Mode 0 Control Word is written into the Counter.
> >
> > Hyper-V and KVM follow the spec, the issue that 35b69a42 "(clockevents/drivers/
> > i8253: Add support for PIT shutdown quirk") fixed is in i8253 drivers, not Hyper-v,
> > so delete the zero timer counter register in shutdown, and delete PIT shutdown
> > quirk for Hyper-v
>
> From the standpoint of Hyper-V, I'm good with this change. But there's a
> risk that old hardware might not be compliant with the spec, and needs the
> zero'ing for some reason. The experts in the x86 space will be in the best
> position to assess the risk.
Yep, my feeling exactly. My input is purely from reading those crusty old specs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-08 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 1:14 [PATCH] clockevents/drivers/i8253: Do not zero timer counter in shutdown lirongqing
2023-02-08 1:04 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-08 15:04 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-02-24 9:45 ` Li,Rongqing
[not found] ` <3b8496c071214bda9e5ecfa048f18ab9@baidu.com>
2023-04-13 1:28 ` Wei Liu
[not found] ` <1311175816673.202304.ZDdawTGHoa/UH20U@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
2023-04-14 5:17 ` Li,Rongqing
2024-08-01 9:00 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 15:22 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-01 21:10 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 14:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-01 16:14 ` Michael Kelley
2024-08-01 18:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-02 8:21 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-02 14:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-02 15:04 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-12 23:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-13 6:39 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 17:49 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 18:25 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 18:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-02 8:07 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-02 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-02 11:04 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-02 13:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-02 13:46 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 19:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-01 19:21 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 20:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-01 20:49 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-01 21:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-01 21:31 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-02 9:55 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+O56OXIuARBhsg2@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).