From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DE6C433EF for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356680AbiD2Jq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 05:46:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59986 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244541AbiD2Jq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 05:46:57 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B532EBE9F1; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 02:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E111063; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 02:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lpieralisi (unknown [10.57.46.17]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BE913F73B; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 02:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:43:20 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Dexuan Cui Cc: Jake Oshins , "bhelgaas@google.com" , Bjorn Helgaas , "wei.liu@kernel.org" , Alex Williamson , KY Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" , "robh@kernel.org" , "kw@linux.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Do not set PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY to reduce VM boot time Message-ID: References: <20220428191213.GA36573@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:11:29AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: > > From: Jake Oshins > > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:21 PM > > ... > > Thanks everybody for responding to my questions. > > > > Bjorn, from your response, it sounds like this change is safe until some possible > > future which new functionality is introduced for rebalancing resources. > > > > Dexuan, I don't have any further objection to the patch. > > > > -- Jake Oshins > > Thank all for the informative discussion!! > > @Bjorn, Lorenzo: can this patch go through the hyperv tree? > I see some recent pci-hyperv commits in the hyperv tree: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git For this patch it should be fine as long as it does not become a rule, we still want to be in the review loop for PCI hyper-V changes. I will comment and ACK shortly. Lorenzo