From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 02/10] KVM: VMX: Add missing CPU based VM execution controls to vmcs_config
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:12:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrUBYTXRxBGYsd1a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622164432.194640-3-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Maybe say "dynamically enabled" or so instead of "missing"?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 24da9e93bdab..01294a2fc1c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2483,8 +2483,14 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
> CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING;
>
> - opt = CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW |
> + opt = CPU_BASED_INTR_WINDOW_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_RDTSC_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW |
> + CPU_BASED_NMI_WINDOW_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS |
> + CPU_BASED_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG |
> CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS |
> + CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS |
> CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_TERTIARY_CONTROLS;
> if (adjust_vmx_controls(min, opt, MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS,
> @@ -4280,6 +4286,13 @@ static u32 vmx_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> {
> u32 exec_control = vmcs_config.cpu_based_exec_ctrl;
>
> + exec_control &= ~(CPU_BASED_INTR_WINDOW_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_RDTSC_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_NMI_WINDOW_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS |
> + CPU_BASED_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG |
> + CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> if (exec_control & CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW)
> exec_control &= ~CPU_BASED_CR8_LOAD_EXITING &
> --
> 2.35.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 16:44 [PATCH RFC v1 00/10] KVM: nVMX: Use vmcs_config for setting up nested VMX MSRs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 01/10] KVM: VMX: Move CPU_BASED_CR8_{LOAD,STORE}_EXITING filtering out of setup_vmcs_config() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-24 0:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 02/10] KVM: VMX: Add missing CPU based VM execution controls to vmcs_config Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-24 0:12 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-06-27 15:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 03/10] KVM: VMX: Move CPU_BASED_{CR3_LOAD,CR3_STORE,INVLPG}_EXITING filtering out of setup_vmcs_config() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-24 0:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 04/10] KVM: VMX: Add missing VMEXIT controls to vmcs_config Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 05/10] KVM: VMX: Add missing VMENTRY " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 06/10] KVM: nVMX: Use sanitized allowed-1 bits for VMX control MSRs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 07/10] KVM: VMX: Store required-1 VMX controls in vmcs_config Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 08/10] KVM: nVMX: Use sanitized required-1 bits for VMX control MSRs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 09/10] KVM: VMX: Cache MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC in vmcs_config Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-22 16:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 10/10] KVM: nVMX: Use cached host MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC value for setting up nested MSR Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-24 0:31 ` [PATCH RFC v1 00/10] KVM: nVMX: Use vmcs_config for setting up nested VMX MSRs Sean Christopherson
2022-06-27 16:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrUBYTXRxBGYsd1a@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).