From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8E9C77B7A for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234932AbjFGL3w (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2023 07:29:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240337AbjFGL3o (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2023 07:29:44 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3331993; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 04:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1686137383; x=1717673383; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UwqTTS8un7pHNkC69VKFGHnWNTgBVFRY5wjuGB303Rc=; b=dDr0OsfmrLRQvikbhXF64uOfpYsolGxJpkgxhYgWx8nsmbANBhwCeHJf KuNnBqGc940JizB5mLWY3ALmh81E73Qp/WVLCqX7fVUOs4Rwa22o7Frrn HR5sIBR0lMJ/r+JG86Z9uuxdKWMxy41z+EMrM0v0ke99K3tLklMIxdEaW FgahT7s6GwEE4+mv/X1Iejs/T8k2TJeaqcWa+IxdXkIhIMismpS71wybk 3QWmGkDQ10QZr9ggBsTi8SDxZD+beEVysxyY6r416OBg2SBDfjn6/3GmP fPWk4hRgO74oJbaYbS0faHZ+LTyIZdAwDOeVk/VqObK0kIprpu9bfTJxo w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10733"; a="385278967" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,223,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="385278967" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2023 04:29:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10733"; a="742625613" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,223,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="742625613" Received: from vsmyers-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.146.233]) ([10.212.146.233]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2023 04:27:55 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 04:27:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Trace hv_set_register() Content-Language: en-US To: Nischala Yelchuri , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tyler Hicks , boqun.feng@gmail.com, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Nischala Yelchuri References: <1686101757-23985-1-git-send-email-niyelchu@linux.microsoft.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <1686101757-23985-1-git-send-email-niyelchu@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org On 6/6/23 18:35, Nischala Yelchuri wrote: > void hv_set_register(unsigned int reg, u64 value) > { > + trace_hyperv_set_register(reg, value); > + > if (hv_nested) > reg = hv_get_nested_reg(reg); I can't help but wonder if this is just a patch for people that don't know how to set kprobes.