From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>,
kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
decui@microsoft.com, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ssengar@microsoft.com, sunilmut@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64/hyperv: Support DeviceTree
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:00:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6f9761a-e542-417a-a2af-ba9f2bd253c4@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <976901c1-1f16-464d-8e65-5b2425c8b05c@linux.microsoft.com>
On 5/14/2024 4:17 PM, Roman Kisel wrote:
>
>
> On 5/14/2024 3:46 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> On 5/10/2024 10:42 AM, Roman Kisel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/10/2024 10:04 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>>> On 5/10/2024 9:05 AM, romank@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Update the driver to support DeviceTree boot as well along with ACPI.
>>>>> This enables the Virtual Trust Level platforms boot up on ARM64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>>>>> index b1a4de4eee29..208a3bcb9686 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/version.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/libfdt.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>>>>> #include <asm/mshyperv.h>
>>>>> static bool hyperv_initialized;
>>>>> @@ -27,6 +30,29 @@ int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info)
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +static bool hyperv_detect_fdt(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>>> + const unsigned long hyp_node = of_get_flat_dt_subnode_by_name(
>>>>> + of_get_flat_dt_root(), "hypervisor");
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return (hyp_node != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND) &&
>>>>> + of_flat_dt_is_compatible(hyp_node, "microsoft,hyperv");
>>>>> +#else
>>>>> + return false;
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static bool hyperv_detect_acpi(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>>>> + return !acpi_disabled &&
>>>>> + !strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8);
>>>>> +#else
>>>>> + return false;
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Could using IS_ENABLED() allow collapsing these two functions into one hyperv_detect_fw()?
>>>> I am wondering if #ifdef was explicitly chosen to allow for the code to be compiled in if CONFIG* is defined
>>>> v/s IS_ENABLED() only being true if the CONFIG value is true.
>>>>
>>> In the hyperv_detect_fdt function, the #ifdef has been chosen due to the functions being declared only when the macro is defined, hence I could not rely on `if IS_ENABLED()` and the run-time detection. For the compile-time option, `#if IS_ENABLED()` would convey the intent better, could update with that.
>>
>> In patch 2/6, just under the diff you have, we already `select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE if OF`, so the declarations (and definitions)
>> of the functions being present is already handled, AFAIK. Are we thinking there may be some weird config where neither OF nor
>> ACPI is selected? If so, we should set a `depends on ACPI || OF` for config HYPERV to prevent that.
>>
>> I don't know if I'm missing something obvious here, so please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
> I just sent out the v2 of the patch set, and (un?)fortunately missed the change I had for the #ifdef's in this chunk (to use #if IS_ENABLED() and remove pre-processor directives from the ACPI-related function).
>
> I am making the point that the change you are suggesting (as I understand) is this conditional statement
>
> if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) {
> const unsigned long hyp_node = of_get_flat_dt_subnode_by_name(
> of_get_flat_dt_root(), "hypervisor");
>
> return (hyp_node != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND) &&
> of_flat_dt_is_compatible(hyp_node, "microsoft,hyperv");
> }
>
That's right, that's the suggestion I'm making.
> and for it to link successfully, one needs of_get_flat_dt_subnode_by_name defined. From the source code, that needs CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE as there is no stub available when CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE is not defined.
We agree that you need of_get_flat_dt_subnode_by_name declared and defined, and it's not available, stub or otherwise, if CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE is not defined.
In my mind, I believed that either ACPI or OF had to be selected for some sort of firmware handoff to occur, but I did some experimentation and ended up with an
x86_64 kernel config that has neither enabled, but nonetheless has CONFIG_HYPERV enabled. The kernel builds with such a config, whether it's useful for anything
is another question. ARM64 requires CONFIG_OF so that side of the equation is clear.
That's where my question above came in: Are we thinking there may be some weird config where neither OF nor ACPI is selected? I thought that was not a reasonable
config, thus my prescription to set `depends on ACPI || OF` for config HYPERV. If there is a use case for an x86_64 kernel that has neither ACPI nor OpenFirmware/FDT,
but nevertheless sets CONFIG_HYPERV, feel free to ignore this comment thread entirely.
Thanks,
Easwar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 16:04 [PATCH 0/6] arm64/hyperv: Support Virtual Trust Level boot romank
2024-05-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64/hyperv: Support DeviceTree romank
2024-05-10 17:04 ` Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-10 17:42 ` Roman Kisel
2024-05-14 22:46 ` Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-14 23:17 ` Roman Kisel
2024-05-15 0:00 ` Easwar Hariharan [this message]
2024-05-20 17:08 ` Roman Kisel
2024-05-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] drivers/hv: Enable VTL mode for arm64 romank
2024-05-12 2:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-15 7:43 ` Wei Liu
2024-05-20 17:00 ` Roman Kisel
2024-05-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64/hyperv: Boot in a Virtual Trust Level romank
2024-05-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] drivers/hv: arch-neutral implementation of get_vtl() romank
2024-05-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] drivers/hv/vmbus: Get the irq number from DeviceTree romank
2024-05-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] drivers/pci/hyperv/arm64: vPCI MSI IRQ domain from DT romank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6f9761a-e542-417a-a2af-ba9f2bd253c4@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=romank@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ssengar@microsoft.com \
--cc=sunilmut@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).