From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AEA1A5A8 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBD0CDE for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695232502; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h5xYFinNZipHsHGmHUqZFR1epFlz8wPv/8ryGu1Ybe8=; b=RUdhs6NCZArzN5tmhbMls6Ei3DrhYhtrd+xrjh63tN8PIUL4cBIEIXXGCVrPQuBFu8t1/+ 3rtTKT2y5jXsUDpxtoaoLBmkvxBoXJ4qW7niW+XLJNbyFM0EbD9ElnFHW1A7Oq7aOgDjOM 816KRapTtghDKkr5frY7YmJNF3f5W/4= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-94-Es1t1rQENiuvK6Xx9XmTng-1; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:55:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Es1t1rQENiuvK6Xx9XmTng-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4011fa32e99so741395e9.0 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:54:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695232498; x=1695837298; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h5xYFinNZipHsHGmHUqZFR1epFlz8wPv/8ryGu1Ybe8=; b=k5lHN8kqCyQcT0ldqqD9guFsVlzkK+nsj5mDTGPhFSR90fZfrtUBtB7XlQpbN/QB/5 ZlKjlJXWu69MbvlVA+MZJFl6WoJ3vFKsgsMI31pZ5bCPAdZ8B+GdptnFEDE1bkck8jVO 4I84Vy6KLsPdouKmKYC6dn+BtFtZXoNtVrRp3Mvp8H2MBi5rXc3XazfCQQspll+a8SET BLcKpFxqSuj7sVTuNnJRRdimZg8ztObO9Xt9Wom5MmI4RoWab/loarSNFSNRTssCUova 81rixnE9V3Thr9/Q5lTzuxoXgdXBnhzv5HjI3Eukm/N9SxK8w4oQwRqTPimsbSp3j6Dz dPJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyiidS4cyTxc8XyuHEX2KEkEXhgwOHt+Qn8a1sVqOjNZyrRX+q2 2jzc9hv19qR7UqjqI/nJTQfF01cxLf+H9lLzEsdfLDeLWnv8K6b853+liYbep1HdV+v8kc2BYQd 8fiN0v1EwLtTy0D+YSoUuoMZa X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce88:0:b0:400:57d1:4910 with SMTP id q8-20020a7bce88000000b0040057d14910mr3302433wmj.17.1695232497847; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:54:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHnadv5Rrllbv+1DebvWmStjUdr36msQ4bItIjpfqmG73HPxauN1Zj4NCrq5iVMGFuoky2thA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce88:0:b0:400:57d1:4910 with SMTP id q8-20020a7bce88000000b0040057d14910mr3302418wmj.17.1695232497523; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:9af8:e5f5:7516:fa89? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:9af8:e5f5:7516:fa89]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g7-20020a05600c310700b003fe15ac0934sm1501378wmo.1.2023.09.20.10.54.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:54:48 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 33/38] x86/entry: Add fred_entry_from_kvm() for VMX to handle IRQ/NMI To: Xin Li , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, jgross@suse.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com References: <20230914044805.301390-1-xin3.li@intel.com> <20230914044805.301390-34-xin3.li@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <20230914044805.301390-34-xin3.li@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On 9/14/23 06:48, Xin Li wrote: > + /* > + * Don't check the FRED stack level, the call stack leading to this > + * helper is effectively constant and shallow (relatively speaking). It's more that we don't need to protect from reentrancy. The external interrupt uses stack level 0 so no adjustment would be needed anyway, and NMI does not use an IST even in the non-FRED case. > + * Emulate the FRED-defined redzone and stack alignment. > + */ > + sub $(FRED_CONFIG_REDZONE_AMOUNT << 6), %rsp > + and $FRED_STACK_FRAME_RSP_MASK, %rsp