From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B48549EC55; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 12:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791464046; cv=none; b=Pjvg5/OoR/u/dFhA897hlRKS34WWShrIqNb/4UVtzxLNoErBbI2kCgllPcGDbc1qSEN+XTz3j5bxLcOIdFiI2/1zuoXwi7kOYbNKSgFTK1tYR7GX13ha2j3raGw30O+OkqOBYfXrghbkpISw2p/fS75VD4jVx5Ej9bbhfRZC2Ic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791464046; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wbx/v7dn4qGJ7W9jrc2kLOYqQqDHnYXf/jJLAs67Qgg=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=EAgnbpvOiOp5BGyTmnCo7optg1rHoGEjODfaPj8uVw8zV2QClMfBtwFgENI5WnNMuFe0MvM3sFygxuAenXg8LhUL712uWrqO5qdd5GdtoQoGCf8YWkMFmX7D11ka9p1TqAjQ4PFJc4gmw2f6mIZcS1m8s6OmNv+UO4S7Qw9jsME= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cSUbLz1w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cSUbLz1w" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 093951F00898; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 12:54:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791464045; bh=wbx/v7dn4qGJ7W9jrc2kLOYqQqDHnYXf/jJLAs67Qgg=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cSUbLz1wvQJZ+iN4pX1xT4dJgFbuDVGMACGqCAmVAHlEzf2bP6lLOwk8sUMrJjWRI FI9vXsn8fD8iOOi1DnvI1TlkrvNy6/BJTK2fUp2az//AyHslvxQnl+xeed7r6e1ZT1 R9/urpx2d+xCubwfAyaUENv5GJF64y0lrxb50vGznZSeCmFgXEPTxlommSipeCno6h b4r+bnjvclZ2BwseWmXtxH6iV/z5604Dv0LhY7h5K7YHu6QScKzSiLiQ2tjwpiP28u T9uV/yAGThITOjSHO8/4/WxpQ6JuDr42ys4W+Y4ymA+PISnMxnQIp63RgJUpu0W9cE TRGrS3PFUT0VA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: mana: support concurrent HWC requests Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Wei Hu" Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:54:04 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Long Li >=20 > Replace the depth-one timeout latch with per-slot sender and response > ownership. Initialize each slot under the inflight resource lock, publish > its bitmap bit last, and release it only after both sides have finished. > This preserves response-buffer withdrawal and timeout quarantine while > allowing independent message IDs to make progress. >=20 > Serialize SQ posting so concurrent senders cannot corrupt the producer > state. A posted request which times out keeps its response reference and > admission permit until its late response arrives or teardown cancels it. >=20 > Return -EBUSY when all slots remain occupied. Admission pressure is not a > response timeout and must not make callers start dead-channel recovery. >=20 > [ ... ] >=20 > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260908035201.402424-4-longli@microsoft.= com > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260914175044.2a26bb46@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Long Li > Signed-off-by: Wei Hu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1790665894.gi= t.weh@linux.microsoft.com?part=3D3