From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Artem Dinaburg" <artem@trailofbits.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 1/2] fbdev: hyperv_fb: Simplify hvfb_putmem
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 19:24:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-164512@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008191309.98263-2-artem@trailofbits.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] fbdev: hyperv_fb: Use-After-Free in dma_free_coherent via deferred fb_destroy
--
commit 5cd0184cceb2674876a9c7e3d72e937d61e3e2d8
Author: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
fbdev: hyperv_fb: Simplify hvfb_putmem
This commit simplifies hvfb_putmem() by removing its hdev parameter. It
derives the device from fb_info and passes it to hvfb_release_phymem()
instead.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1740845791-19977-2-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c
> index 80e8ec36b7db2..80e6d96821795 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c
> @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static phys_addr_t hvfb_get_phymem(struct hv_device *hdev,
> }
>
> /* Release contiguous physical memory */
> -static void hvfb_release_phymem(struct hv_device *hdev,
> +static void hvfb_release_phymem(struct device *device,
> phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned int size)
> {
> unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> @@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static void hvfb_release_phymem(struct hv_device *hdev,
> if (order <= MAX_ORDER)
> __free_pages(pfn_to_page(paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT), order);
> else
> - dma_free_coherent(&hdev->device,
> + dma_free_coherent(device,
> round_up(size, PAGE_SIZE),
> phys_to_virt(paddr),
> paddr);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ static int hvfb_getmem(struct hv_device *hdev, struct fb_info *info)
> }
>
> /* Release the framebuffer */
> -static void hvfb_putmem(struct hv_device *hdev, struct fb_info *info)
> +static void hvfb_putmem(struct fb_info *info)
> {
> struct hvfb_par *par = info->par;
>
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ static void hvfb_putmem(struct hv_device *hdev, struct fb_info *info)
> iounmap(par->mmio_vp);
> vmbus_free_mmio(par->mem->start, screen_fb_size);
> } else {
> - hvfb_release_phymem(hdev, info->fix.smem_start,
> + hvfb_release_phymem(info->device, info->fix.smem_start,
> screen_fb_size);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can this change lead to dma_free_coherent() in drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c
dereferencing a freed device pointer when executed from a deferred fb_destroy()
callback?
Moving framebuffer memory teardown, via hvfb_putmem(), to the asynchronous
fb_destroy() callback causes it to execute when the last userspace reference
is dropped.
If /dev/fb0 is held open by a user process when the Hyper-V device is removed
or unbound, the driver's remove() callback unregisters the framebuffer and
returns. At this point, the driver core drops the final reference to the
parent hv_device and frees it.
Later, when the user process closes the file descriptor, fb_destroy() invokes
hvfb_putmem(), which calls dma_free_coherent() using info->device. This points
to the now-freed &hdev->device.
Because dma_free_coherent() dereferences this device pointer to access dma_ops,
does this result in a concrete use-after-free and likely a kernel panic?
Checking the final state of the series reveals no get_device(&hdev->device)
was added to ensure the device outlives the fb_info.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008191309.98263-1-artem@trailofbits.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 19:13 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/2] fbdev: backport CVE-2025-21976 Artem Dinaburg
2026-10-08 19:13 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/2] fbdev: hyperv_fb: Simplify hvfb_putmem Artem Dinaburg
2026-10-08 19:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 19:13 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/2] fbdev: hyperv_fb: Allow graceful removal of framebuffer Artem Dinaburg
2026-10-08 19:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-164512@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=artem@trailofbits.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox