From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bg1.exmail.qq.com (bg1.exmail.qq.com [114.132.58.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7210211196 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.132.58.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708248041; cv=none; b=ZDuDojAdO+J+9E9co5ioiuBsK5p2rUzOjvD9ouKCTQvOAln9yaBfZRYJNgydbm868Hh9CXT5cnU2H6CMELv9mzAzNbbNqCu0P77qIhXa4Yv2fJqjami2awW9TIJltPeLs1aVcdbkNFZUFd2HmT1pehNX9fc7sT8zi7rXffryLY4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708248041; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DgPNwzzQuoFHe2Y5tX+SUNnXJk95BHHmySZ6oqafB+E=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hz1Cw/ZyS9WFUgYg7GQDrET9GieMj2mnopdJlzmN/W5DQtBsJ1T12vqLwpeRSsqivnQ3SWK1iksgHbNyTUiNlql2mR9D/scXw6CQy5YP+yUaiS33wztWE3u6QuNFN3GrDxyMFS0T/Z46QnOYpkammkdudn6r1DFKx3n4EXB87+w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=trustnetic.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=trustnetic.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.132.58.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=trustnetic.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=trustnetic.com X-QQ-mid:Yeas53t1708247954t177t08839 Received: from 3DB253DBDE8942B29385B9DFB0B7E889 (jiawenwu@trustnetic.com [122.235.246.158]) X-QQ-SSF:00400000000000F0FTF000000000000 From: =?utf-8?b?Smlhd2VuIFd1?= X-BIZMAIL-ID: 16135054984999250213 To: "'Jarkko Nikula'" , Cc: "'Andi Shyti'" , "'Andy Shevchenko'" , "'Mika Westerberg'" , "'Jan Dabros'" , "'Sanket Goswami'" , "'Basavaraj Natikar'" , References: <20240213124847.672084-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20240213124847.672084-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: designware: Generic polling mode code Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 17:19:13 +0800 Message-ID: <003901da624b$89c7c190$9d5744b0$@trustnetic.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: zh-cn Thread-Index: AQKAWE6xFupILVV4nfObJxnfcYlh7K/D5Ysw X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: Yeas:trustnetic.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz8a-1 On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 8:49 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > Hi Jiawen, Sanket and Basavaraj > > I hope you could give a quick test to this patchset to see it won't cause > regression on your HW. This is mostly the same than the first version what > Jiawen tested earlier but in this 3rd version I decided to drop semphore > touching code patches from v2 due they being out of scope and fix a few > things noted by Andy. > > Changes are in the patch 3/6 with two minor fixes to comments while moving > them and the patch 6/6 where i2c_dw_wait_transfer() is slightly modified > by Andy's suggestion plus I decided to remove one comment which became > unclear after this patch. Hi Jarkko, I've been testing the v3 patch series on Wangxun 10Gb NIC, it works well, too. Thanks! Tested-by: Jiawen Wu