From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: s3c2410: Handle i2c sys_cfg register in i2c driver Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:42:43 +0900 Message-ID: <018d01d005ed$3a777640$af6662c0$@kernel.org> References: <1414656270-8048-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1414656270-8048-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20141121072545.GG1480@katana> <546F1140.4050709@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <546F1140.4050709@samsung.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Pankaj Dubey' , 'Wolfram Sang' Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, thomas.ab@samsung.com, 'Rob Herring' , 'Randy Dunlap' , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > On Friday 21 November 2014 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > >> Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will > >> help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and > >> will help in removing static iomapping of SYS register in exynos.c > >> > >> Since only Exynos5250, and Exynos5420 has i2c nodes in DT, added syscon > >> based phandle to i2c device nodes of respective SoC DT files. > >> Well...actually there are 4ch i2c in exynos5410 and exynos5800 as well, i2c nodes are not added in dt files though. > >> Also handle saving and restoring of SYS_I2C_CFG register during > >> suspend and resume of i2c driver. > >> > >> CC: Rob Herring > >> CC: Randy Dunlap > >> CC: Wolfram Sang > >> CC: Russell King > >> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > >> CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > >> CC: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org > >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-s3c2410.txt | 1 + > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 4 +++ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 4 +++ > > > > I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say > > so if there are reasons I should take them. > > I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver. > I am not very sure via which tree this should go. May be I can ask > samsung SoC maintainer Kukjin to look into this, as patch 2/2 has > changes in mach-exynos which should go via Kukjin's tree. > I'll reply on other email. Thanks, Kukjin