From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vivien Didelot Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: (at24) move header to linux/platform_data/ Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:19:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1033284781.908504.1377285587778.JavaMail.root@mail> References: <20130823190247.GA3821@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130823190247.GA3821@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-4ysUXcep3aM1wj+D4I0NRVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Wolfram wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:38:20PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > > This patch moves the at24.h header from include/linux/i2c to > > include/linux/platform_data and updates existing support > > accordingly. > > This message explains what the patch does but not why the change is > wanted. I'd be surprised if we really want *all* platform_data in one > single directory? IMHO it makes sense. Why wouldn't we want all platform_data in include/linux/platform_data/? > Is this patch part of a bigger series? No. > That being said i2c is not the best place for this include, in deed... I agree. Thanks, Vivien