From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steven J. Hill" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: octeon: thunder: Fix i2c not working on Octeon Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:47:28 -0600 Message-ID: <10e3f92d-2f8b-0862-1029-e9617d770f73@cavium.com> References: <1479149445-4663-1-git-send-email-jglauber@cavium.com> <99500824-4c63-b769-ad66-c136529b14b2@cavium.com> <20161122120106.GB3993@katana> <20161122145539.GA7716@hardcore> <20161128142208.GA3916@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161128142208.GA3916@katana> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Wolfram Sang , Jan Glauber Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Paul Burton , David Daney List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/2016 08:22 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >>>> This does not work on Octeon 71xx platforms. I will look at it more >>>> closely tomorrow. >>> >>> What's the outcome here? It seems we want a bugfix for 4.9 but this >>> report keeps me reluctant to apply the series. >>> >> >> Steven, did you have a chance to check which of the patches makes >> Octeon 71xx fail? > > How do we proceed with this one? Is somebody at Cavium able to contact > Steven internally? I mentioned this on-going regression to Linus and > said an rc8 would help us, but reading LWN it seems we shouldn't count > on it... > I will finish the bisecting today and will let you know as soon as the bug is found. Steve