From: bruno.roussel@free.fr
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
bruno.roussel@free.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:00:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205600416.47dc00a0cd55b@imp.free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080310142921.2696e8b9@hyperion.delvare>
I have switch to the new 2.6.24.3 kernel version and it's OK now
Strange ...
Thank's for all
Selon Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:41:50 +0100 (CET), Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Christian Kujau wrote:
> >
> > > > =============================================
> > > > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> > > > 2.6.24.2-1mdv #1
> > > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > Hm, strange: a similiar looking issue has been reported back in 2006, it
> > > even comes with a patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/14/38
> > > ..but I cannot tell if the patch made it into mainline. I've Cc'ed the
> i2c
> > > folks, maybe they can tell what's going on here.
> >
> > I don't recall this, but from looking at the source it seems that only
> > part of my patch made it upstream for some reason ...
>
> I applied the i2c-core part:
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6ea23039cb1cc7c379eb5fba0ed2c53291e9bea7
>
> But I have no idea what happened to the DVB device-driver specific part.
>
> >
> > Bruno, does the patch below remove the warning for you? (we should rather
> > used lockdep_set_class() now, when this is already available ... it wasn't
> > in the time I was doping the original patch back in 2006).
> >
> >
> >
> > Set locking depth properly (level == 0 for DVB frontend, level == 1 for
> > DVB adapter).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-i2c.c
> b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-i2c.c
> > index 23428cd..8c5dc35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-i2c.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ int dvb_usb_i2c_init(struct dvb_usb_device *d)
> > #endif
> > d->i2c_adap.algo = d->props.i2c_algo;
> > d->i2c_adap.algo_data = NULL;
> > + d->i2c_adap.level = 1;
> > d->i2c_adap.dev.parent = &d->udev->dev;
> >
> > i2c_set_adapdata(&d->i2c_adap, d);
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/dibx000_common.c
> b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/dibx000_common.c
> > index 315e09e..a3ed8cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/dibx000_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/dibx000_common.c
> > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static int i2c_adapter_init(struct i2c_adapter
> *i2c_adap, struct i2c_algorithm *
> > i2c_adap->class = I2C_CLASS_TV_DIGITAL,
> > i2c_adap->algo = algo;
> > i2c_adap->algo_data = NULL;
> > + i2c_adap->level = 0;
> > i2c_set_adapdata(i2c_adap, mst);
> > if (i2c_add_adapter(i2c_adap) < 0)
> > return -ENODEV;
>
> Also note:
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=cea443a81c9c6257bf2d00f1392f7d1d4ce03b75
>
> This patch that was applied recently to i2c-core might cause lockdep
> issues. For some reason there's no "nested" variant of mutex_trylock?
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-15 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1205082504.47d41988f0db5@imp.free.fr>
2008-03-09 21:16 ` possible recursive locking detected Christian Kujau
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803092215010.5349-F0SnE0R9v5eQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-09 22:41 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803092332160.18589-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-10 13:29 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-15 17:00 ` bruno.roussel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205600416.47dc00a0cd55b@imp.free.fr \
--to=bruno.roussel@free.fr \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox