From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott James Remnant Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/31] i2c: Auto-load i2c_dev module when device opened. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:00:57 +0000 Message-ID: <1236704457.6339.0.camel@quest> References: <20090310175612.7e5b8272@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WOI/W2uT6UJCbBUtKzJw" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090310175612.7e5b8272-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --=-WOI/W2uT6UJCbBUtKzJw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 17:56 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Your clock is off by a significant number of days, isn't it? >=20 No, I've just been carefully testing them - and then waited until they were in the jaunty kernel and a couple of thousand other users not-so-carefully tested them too Scott --=20 Scott James Remnant scott-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org --=-WOI/W2uT6UJCbBUtKzJw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkm2nMkACgkQSnQiFMl4yK4aVwCfboU8Dr+Bs8RLXQI69kx0fZFH yBgAn05Cep5h0enafdYzD6NkNhp1aYtf =zVE8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WOI/W2uT6UJCbBUtKzJw--