From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c/mux: Driver for PCA9541 I2C Master Selector Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:50:53 -0700 Message-ID: <1287521453.9690.299.camel@groeck-laptop> References: <1286932516-20689-1-git-send-email-guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> <20101019190647.314302e7@endymion.delvare> Reply-To: guenter.roeck@ericsson.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101019190647.314302e7@endymion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Ben Dooks , Rodolfo Giometti , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean, On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 13:06 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: [ ... ] > > + > > +/* > > + * I2C init/probing/exit functions > > + */ > > +static int __devinit pca9541_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > + const struct i2c_device_id *id) > > The use of __devinit and __devexit isn't recommended for i2c drivers. > If your driver is built into the kernel but the underlying i2c bus > driver is build as a module, you're in trouble. > I don't mind changing this, but ... the code is copied from pca954x.c, which also uses __devinit and __devexit for the same functions. Wouldn't that be a problem there as well ? Or am I missing something ? Thanks, Guenter