From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] I2C: OMAP: I2C fixes, removal of cpu_is... from driver Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:12:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1309212726.6231.14.camel@vence> References: <1306973984-15165-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <20110615213637.GH15795@trinity.fluff.org> <87k4cm1xgj.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87k4cm1xgj.fsf@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Andy Green , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:33 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Ben Dooks writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 05:19:26PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Ben, > >> > >> Please pull in this series from Andy Green for the next merge window. > >> > >> v4 is simply a rebase of Andy's v3 against v3.0-rc1 with some basic > >> sanity testing against with the latest kernel. > > > > These look much more like functionality changes than actual fixes, and > > are much more suited for inclusion into -next for once the next stable > > release is out. > > Correct, this is a rework of functionality, not a set of fixes. This > series is targeted for the next release (v3.1), not for fixes > (v3.0-rc). > > I was requesting for it to be included in your queue for -next and for > the next merge window. > > Tony has already been merging this in his omap-testing branch so it is > has been getting lots of testing on OMAP platforms already. Ping. I don't see this in linux-next yet. Are you planning to queue this for v3.1? Thanks, Kevin