[PATCH 09/17] i2c: omap: ack IRQ in parts

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

According to flow diagrams on OMAP TRMs,
we should ACK the IRQ as they happen.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index f978b14..c00ba7d 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -894,21 +894,20 @@ omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
 		}
 
 complete:
-		/*
-		 * Ack the stat in one go, but [R/X]DR and [R/X]RDY should be
-		 * acked after the data operation is complete.
-		 * Ref: TRM SWPU114Q Figure 18-31
-		 */
-		omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG, stat &
-				~(OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR |
-				OMAP_I2C_STAT_XRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_XDR));
-
-		if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK)
+		if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK) {
+			dev_err(dev->dev, "No Acknowledge\n");
 			err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK;
+			omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK);
+			omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
+			return IRQ_HANDLED;
+		}
 
 		if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL) {
 			dev_err(dev->dev, "Arbitration lost\n");
 			err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL;
+			omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK);
+			omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
+			return IRQ_HANDLED;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -989,12 +988,18 @@ complete:
 
 		if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR) {
 			dev_err(dev->dev, "Receive overrun\n");
-			dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR;
+			err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR;
+			omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR);
+			omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
+			return IRQ_HANDLED;
 		}
 
 		if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF) {
 			dev_err(dev->dev, "Transmit underflow\n");
-			dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF;
+			err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF;
+			omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF);
+			omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
+			return IRQ_HANDLED;
 		}
 	} while (stat);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4