From: Tony Prisk <linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wolfram-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia I2C master-mode
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:41:04 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360798864.18078.21.camel@gitbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130213201307.GA8795-8EAEigeeuNG034pCzgS/Qg7AFbiQbgqx@public.gmane.org>
Thanks for the review.
My replies are inline. Mostly 'ok' and 'will dos'.
To save you trawling through it all, here's the two replies/comments
that are *different*:
1) I am working on pinmux at the moment - will hold off on this driver
until pinmux is completed.
2)
> + i2c_dev->clk = of_clk_get(np, 0);
>
> There is also devm_clk_get.
devm_clk_get requires a 'clock name'.
Since vt8500 is DT-only, and clock-names is an optional property in the
clocks binding I preferred not to *require* an optional property.
If I am misunderstanding this, please correct me.
Regards
Tony Prisk
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 21:13 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Ho Tony,
>
> here is my review.
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:52:26PM +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > This patch adds support for the I2C controller found on Wondermedia
> > SoCs.
> >
> > Due to the lack of pinmux support, GPIO pin alternate functions are
> > configured by machine's compatible property, as are pullups.
>
> Is there pinmux support planned/on its way? Maybe it is worth waiting
> for it? If not, I'd think the setup should be done in mach-code, not the
> driver.
I am actually working on pinmux at the moment so I will remove this
gpio-setup code and get the pinmux code into mainline first before
resubmitting this driver.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-wmt.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-wmt.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..07d86e3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-wmt.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,636 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Wondermedia I2C Master Mode Driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Tony Prisk <linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>
> > + *
> > + * Derived from GPL licensed source:
> > + * - Copyright (C) 2008 WonderMedia Technologies, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation
> > + */
>
> Are the sources you derived from also V2 only? Otherwise you might be
> changing other people's license decision.
Oh dear.. almost.
Original source was v2 or later. I will update the license text to
indicate 'later' is also applicable.
>
> > +static int wmt_i2c_wait_bus_not_busy(struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > +{
> > + u16 val;
> > + int i;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CSR);
> > + if (val & CSR_READY_MASK)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + udelay(1);
> > + }
> > + if (i >= 9999999)
> > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> That's 10 seconds (max) of busy looping? Nah, please don't hog the CPU
> for that.
Eek. Not sure how I missed that. Will fix.
>
> > +
> > +static int wmt_check_status(struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (i2c_dev->cmd_status & ISR_NACK_ADDR)
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > +
> > + if (i2c_dev->cmd_status & ISR_SCL_TIMEOUT)
> > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int wmt_i2c_write(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *pmsg,
> > + int restart, int last)
> > +{
> > + struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> > + u16 val;
> > + u16 tcr_val;
>
> I'd prefer to aggregate the last two lines (here and in general), but no
> strong opinion on that.
My preference is for one variable per line but I'm happy to go with the
majority (if there is one).
>
> > + int ret;
> > + int wait_result;
> > + u32 xfer_len = 0;
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len < 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> len is a u16.
Sorry - copied verbatim from the vendor source.. I should know better by
now.
>
> > +
> > + if (restart == 0) {
>
> I think '!restart' is a tad more readable, but again, no strong opinion.
Agree - will change.
>
> > + ret = wmt_i2c_wait_bus_not_busy(i2c_dev);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len == 0)
> > + writew(0, i2c_dev->base + REG_CDR);
> > + else
> > + writew(pmsg->buf[0] & 0xFF, i2c_dev->base + REG_CDR);
> > +
> > + if (restart == 0) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val &= ~CR_TX_END;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > +
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= CR_CPU_RDY;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
>
> Just to make sure: Not possible to do both in one write?
I don't know the answer to that question. The original vendor source did
it with two separate read-modify-write calls, so I kept it the same.
I can test it, although at first glance, I would guess it's done this
way because val |= CR_CPU_RDY will start the transfer immediately and
the val &= ~CR_TX_END may not have been processed within the
hardware?!?!
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + init_completion(&i2c_dev->complete);
> > +
> > + if (i2c_dev->mode == I2C_MODE_STANDARD)
> > + tcr_val = TCR_STANDARD_MODE;
> > + else
> > + tcr_val = TCR_FAST_MODE;
> > +
> > + tcr_val |= (TCR_MASTER_WRITE | (pmsg->addr & TCR_SLAVE_ADDR_MASK));
> > +
> > + writew(tcr_val, i2c_dev->base + REG_TCR);
> > +
> > + if (restart == 1) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= CR_CPU_RDY;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for (;;) {
>
> Have you tried 'while (xfer_len < pmsg->len) ...' and directly 'return
> err' on errors? Might have potential to be more concise.
Can do.
>
> > + wait_result = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> > + &i2c_dev->complete, 500 * HZ / 1000);
>
> Please don't use interruptible here. Most drivers had lots of problems
> with it and it seems you are not checking the signals anyhow.
Again, taken from vendor source - will change.
>
> > +
> > + if (wait_result == 0) {
> > + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "wait timeout (tx)\n");
> > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = wmt_check_status(i2c_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + xfer_len++;
> > +
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CSR);
> > + if ((val & CSR_RCV_ACK_MASK) == CSR_RCV_NOT_ACK) {
> > + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "write RCV NACK error\n");
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len == 0) {
> > + val = CR_TX_END | CR_CPU_RDY | CR_ENABLE;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len > xfer_len) {
> > + writew(pmsg->buf[xfer_len] & 0xFF, i2c_dev->base +
> > + REG_CDR);
> > + writew(CR_CPU_RDY | CR_ENABLE, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + } else if (pmsg->len == xfer_len) {
> > + if (last != 1)
> > + writew(CR_ENABLE, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + break;
> > + } else {
> > + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "unknown error (tx)\n");
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int wmt_i2c_read(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *pmsg,
> > + int restart, int last)
>
> Same comment as for the write function.
>
> > +{
> > + struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> > + u16 val;
> > + u16 tcr_val;
> > + int ret;
> > + int wait_result;
> > + u32 xfer_len = 0;
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len <= 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (restart == 0) {
> > + ret = wmt_i2c_wait_bus_not_busy(i2c_dev);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val &= ~CR_TX_END;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > +
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val &= ~CR_TX_NEXT_NO_ACK;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > +
> > + if (restart == 0) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= CR_CPU_RDY;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len == 1) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= CR_TX_NEXT_NO_ACK;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + }
> > +
> > + init_completion(&i2c_dev->complete);
> > +
> > + if (i2c_dev->mode == I2C_MODE_STANDARD)
> > + tcr_val = TCR_STANDARD_MODE;
> > + else
> > + tcr_val = TCR_FAST_MODE;
> > +
> > + tcr_val |= TCR_MASTER_READ | (pmsg->addr & TCR_SLAVE_ADDR_MASK);
> > +
> > + writew(tcr_val, i2c_dev->base + REG_TCR);
> > +
> > + if (restart == 1) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= CR_CPU_RDY;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for (;;) {
> > + wait_result = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> > + &i2c_dev->complete, 500 * HZ / 1000);
>
> no interruptible
>
> > +
> > + if (wait_result == 0) {
> > + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "wait timeout (tx)\n");
> > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = wmt_check_status(i2c_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + pmsg->buf[xfer_len] = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CDR) >> 8;
> > + xfer_len++;
> > +
> > + if (pmsg->len > xfer_len) {
> > + if (pmsg->len - 1 == xfer_len) {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= (CR_TX_NEXT_NO_ACK | CR_CPU_RDY);
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + } else {
> > + val = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + val |= CR_CPU_RDY;
> > + writew(val, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + }
> > + } else if (pmsg->len == xfer_len) {
> > + break;
> > + } else {
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int wmt_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > + struct i2c_msg msgs[],
> > + int num)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
> > + int i;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + int is_last;
> > + int restart;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; ret >= 0 && i < num; i++) {
> > + is_last = ((i + 1) == num);
> > + restart = (i != 0);
> > +
> > + pmsg = &msgs[i];
> > + if (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_NOSTART)
> > + restart = 1;
> > + if (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> > + ret = wmt_i2c_read(adap, pmsg, restart, is_last);
> > + else
> > + ret = wmt_i2c_write(adap, pmsg, restart, is_last);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + else
> > + return i;
> > +}
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : i;
>
> > +
> > +static u32 wmt_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> > +{
> > + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
>
> I2C_FUNC_NOSTART is missing.
Again - taken from vendor source as is. Will read the book (to find out
what it does) and add.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct i2c_algorithm wmt_i2c_algo = {
> > + .master_xfer = wmt_i2c_xfer,
> > + .functionality = wmt_i2c_func,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t wmt_i2c_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = data;
> > +
> > + /* save the status and write-clear it */
> > + i2c_dev->cmd_status = readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_ISR);
> > + writew(i2c_dev->cmd_status, i2c_dev->base + REG_ISR);
> > +
> > + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Due to a lack of pinmux functionality we need to manually configure
> > + * the GPIO pullup. Once pinmux is implemented, this function should be
> > + * removed. Pullup's are not available on vt8500 or wm8505 so we skip.
> > + */
>
> As mentioned above, move to mach-code?
Will drop before v2.
>
> ...
>
> > +static int wmt_i2c_reset_hardware(struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = clk_prepare_enable(i2c_dev->clk);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = clk_set_rate(i2c_dev->clk, 20000000);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "failed to set clock = 20Mhz\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = wmt_i2c_setup_gpio(i2c_dev);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + writew(0, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + writew(12, i2c_dev->base + REG_MCR);
> > + writew(ISR_WRITE_ALL, i2c_dev->base + REG_ISR);
> > + writew(IMR_ENABLE_ALL, i2c_dev->base + REG_IMR);
> > + writew(CR_ENABLE, i2c_dev->base + REG_CR);
> > + readw(i2c_dev->base + REG_CSR); /* read clear */
> > + writew(ISR_WRITE_ALL, i2c_dev->base + REG_ISR);
> > +
> > + if (i2c_dev->mode == I2C_MODE_STANDARD)
> > + writew(0x8064, i2c_dev->base + REG_TR);
> > + else
> > + writew(0x8019, i2c_dev->base + REG_TR);
> > +
> > + return 0;
>
> Too many magic numbers in this last block.
When I wrote this piece of code I had no idea what these magic numbers
meant. I've since figured it out and will redo.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int wmt_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev;
> > + struct i2c_adapter *adap;
> > + struct resource *res;
>
> No special alignment, please.
Ok.
>
> > + int err;
> > + u32 clk_rate;
> > +
> > + if (!np) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "device node not found\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + if (!res) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no memory resource defined\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
>
> devm_request_and_ioremap will check res for you.
Ok. Will drop the error check.
>
> > +
> > + i2c_dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*i2c_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!i2c_dev) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "device memory allocation failed\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + i2c_dev->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> > + if (!i2c_dev->base) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "memory region unavailable\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + i2c_dev->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
> > + if (!i2c_dev->irq) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq missing or invalid\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + i2c_dev->clk = of_clk_get(np, 0);
>
> There is also devm_clk_get.
devm_clk_get requires a 'clock name'.
Since vt8500 is DT-only, and clock-names is an optional property in the
clocks binding I preferred not to *require* an optional property.
If I am misunderstanding this, please correct me.
>
> > + if (IS_ERR(i2c_dev->clk)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request clock\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(i2c_dev->clk);
> > + }
> > +
> > + i2c_dev->mode = I2C_MODE_STANDARD;
> > + err = of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &clk_rate);
> > + if ((!err) && (clk_rate == 400000))
> > + i2c_dev->mode = I2C_MODE_FAST;
> > +
> > + i2c_dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > + err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c_dev->irq, wmt_i2c_isr, 0,
> > + "i2c", i2c_dev);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq %i\n", i2c_dev->irq);
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + adap = &i2c_dev->adapter;
> > + i2c_set_adapdata(adap, i2c_dev);
> > + strlcpy(adap->name, "WMT I2C adapter", sizeof(adap->name));
> > + adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > + adap->class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON;
> > + adap->algo = &wmt_i2c_algo;
> > + adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > + adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + adap->nr = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "i2c");
>
> No alignment with tabs, please.
Ok.
>
> > +
> > + err = wmt_i2c_reset_hardware(i2c_dev);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error initializing hardware\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (adap->nr < 0)
> > + err = i2c_add_adapter(adap);
> > + else
> > + err = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(adap);
> > +
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add adapter\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c_dev);
> > +
> > + of_i2c_register_devices(adap);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int wmt_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct wmt_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + i2c_del_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>
> Is it guaranteed that interrupts cannot occur anymore? Otherwise OOPS
> might happen, since the adapter is cleared here already but devm will
> remove the interrupt only a little later.
Hmm.. good point. I will add some hw-stop code in here as well.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct of_device_id wmt_i2c_dt_ids[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "wm,wm8505-i2c" },
> > + { /* Sentinel */ },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver wmt_i2c_driver = {
> > + .probe = wmt_i2c_probe,
> > + .remove = wmt_i2c_remove,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "wmt-i2c",
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .of_match_table = wmt_i2c_dt_ids,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver(wmt_i2c_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Wondermedia I2C master-mode bus adapter");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tony Prisk <linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, wmt_i2c_dt_ids);
>
> Also, checkpatch found a trailing whitespace somewhere.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-13 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 5:52 [GIT PULL] i2c: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia I2C master-mode Tony Prisk
[not found] ` <1358315546-2201-1-git-send-email-linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-16 5:52 ` [PATCH] " Tony Prisk
[not found] ` <1358315546-2201-2-git-send-email-linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-13 20:13 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20130213201307.GA8795-8EAEigeeuNG034pCzgS/Qg7AFbiQbgqx@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-13 23:41 ` Tony Prisk [this message]
2013-02-14 10:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-02-11 23:02 ` [GIT PULL] " Wolfram Sang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-12-28 1:29 [PATCH] " Tony Prisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360798864.18078.21.camel@gitbox \
--to=linux-ci5g2ko2hbz+pu9mqzgvbq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wolfram-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).