linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: "christian.ruppert-Yycd8EPnGM5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
	<christian.ruppert-Yycd8EPnGM5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org"
	<mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Vineet.Gupta1-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org"
	<Vineet.Gupta1-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org"
	<wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
	"andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org"
	<andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"christian.ruppert-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
	<christian.ruppert-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Suppress error message if platform_get_irq() returns -EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:37:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425400650.17965.53.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F5E120.3090705-Yycd8EPnGM5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>

Hi Christian,

On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 17:28 +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On 2015-03-03 16:27, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > There's no point in printing error message if platform_get_irq()
> > returns -EPROBE_DEFER because probe deferring subsystem already outputs
> > message in bootlog like this:
> >  --->8---
> >  platform e001d000.i2c: Driver i2c_designware requests probe deferral
> >  --->8---
> > 
> > Moreover in case of probe deferral following message may mislead user:
> >  --->8---
> >  i2c_designware e001d000.i2c: no irq resource?
> >  --->8---
> > even though it's expected that platform_get_irq() may return
> > -EPROBE_DEFER.
> >  
> >  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> >  	if (irq < 0) {
> > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq resource?\n");
> > +		if (irq != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq resource?\n");
> 
> Presented like this I wonder if this merits being a dev_err at all.
> Wouldn't dev_dbg be more adequate? This might remove the need for the
> condition and also avoid bothering everyone if something in the platform
> device structures or device tree is not right.
> 
> >  		return irq; /* -ENXIO */
> >  	}

We've just had similar discussion related to DW APB UART with Andy here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/412

So yes probably we may safely remove error message from here completely.

-Alexey

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 15:27 [PATCH] i2c: designware: Suppress error message if platform_get_irq() returns -EPROBE_DEFER Alexey Brodkin
2015-03-03 16:28 ` Christian Ruppert
     [not found]   ` <54F5E120.3090705-Yycd8EPnGM5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-03 16:37     ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
     [not found]       ` <1425400650.17965.53.camel-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-03 16:50         ` christian.ruppert-Yycd8EPnGM5BDgjK7y7TUQ
2015-03-03 17:21           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-03 17:46             ` Christian Ruppert
2015-03-03 19:03               ` Andy Shevchenko
     [not found]                 ` <1425409412.14897.157.camel-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-03 19:11                   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-03 19:34                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-07  0:24         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-09  8:29           ` Alexey Brodkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1425400650.17965.53.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=alexey.brodkin-hkixbcoqz3hwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=christian.ruppert-Yycd8EPnGM5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=christian.ruppert-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).